All-New: Type 81M
- Thread starter Tactical Imports
- Start date
Everything looks nice and straight, wood is about as I expected... looked like crap out of the box, put a few drops of BLO on it and cleaned/oiled it up a bit and it came around. It's not quite that orange with the naked eye, I like the figure on the one side of the buttstock.
Last edited:
It's called point of aim (POA). Maybe read up on that !
StansfieldMcElroy
CGN Regular
- Location
- Upper Canada
Everything looks nice and straight, wood is about as I expected... looked like crap out of the box, put a few drops of BLO on it and cleaned/oiled it up a bit and it came around. It's not quite that orange with the naked eye, I like the figure on the one side of the buttstock.
My magazine is like a rattle can while inserted. Pretty loose fitting, thought it was going to fall out just walking with it in the house. Is everyone's tight or is it just me, loose tolerances? I remember my numerous VZ/CZ 58's being a snug fit, this is my first T81.
your magazine isn't seated properly in your pictures. give it another try and report back
Everything looks nice and straight, wood is about as I expected... looked like crap out of the box, put a few drops of BLO on it and cleaned/oiled it up a bit and it came around. It's not quite that orange with the naked eye, I like the figure on the one side of the buttstock.
My magazine is like a rattle can while inserted. Pretty loose fitting, thought it was going to fall out just walking with it in the house. Is everyone's tight or is it just me, loose tolerances? I remember my numerous VZ/CZ 58's being a snug fit, this is my first T81.
All my mags go in perfect and come out nice no rattles... could be just that mag? measure it to rest..
This right here lol
Agreed, mag isn't in... my underfolder came in today, mags are nice and tight
MustardoTigre
Member
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario
Everything looks nice and straight, wood is about as I expected... looked like crap out of the box, put a few drops of BLO on it and cleaned/oiled it up a bit and it came around. It's not quite that orange with the naked eye, I like the figure on the one side of the buttstock.
My magazine is like a rattle can while inserted. Pretty loose fitting, thought it was going to fall out just walking with it in the house. Is everyone's tight or is it just me, loose tolerances? I remember my numerous VZ/CZ 58's being a snug fit, this is my first T81.
Your mag isn't inserted correctly. Could be the cause of your wobbly mags lol.
Damn, you are correct. Oily hands... it's fine. I'm one of the boneheads piling on, eh
Pretty pleased to be honest. Might not even strip the wood, looks fine as it is. I did like the look of the older style, reddish furniture though. Will see.
Last edited:
Dorian Gray
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Everything looks nice and straight, wood is about as I expected... looked like crap out of the box, put a few drops of BLO on it and cleaned/oiled it up a bit and it came around. It's not quite that orange with the naked eye, I like the figure on the one side of the buttstock.
My magazine is like a rattle can while inserted. Pretty loose fitting, thought it was going to fall out just walking with it in the house. Is everyone's tight or is it just me, loose tolerances? I remember my numerous VZ/CZ 58's being a snug fit, this is my first T81.
From those pics, it doesn't look like your magazine is in correctly. I could be wrong but I think you need to take it out and re-insert it with more of a "rock and lock" style. Tilt the magazine backward, insert the front in deep and then rock it rearward. You shouldn't see any of the steel reinforced top part when the mag is inserted properly.
Look at your pics, and then look at the way a properly inserted mag looks:
That might explain the loose fitting and rattle.
Attachments
Have to admit, it's going to be a very hard choice whether to sell the new underfolder or the side folder I have. Honestly think I'm going to keep the old one. Fit and finish seem better, as is the trigger, feels nicer in the hand ( slimmer/ lighter )
And definitely less barrel heavy. I think the only think the new one has going for it is looks and sight radius.
And definitely less barrel heavy. I think the only think the new one has going for it is looks and sight radius.
Any pics side by side? Just interested in the differences.
MustardoTigre
Member
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario
Perhaps you can keep both, my guy.
apexanimal
CGN Regular
- Location
- Vancouver Island
The fact you think 4 moa at 30m is 13 moa at 100m shows you know absolutely nothing about shooting lmfao.
Its freaking hilarious how often this keeps popping up lol
...'cause 9-12 MOA would be evident.
Came with a little damage as well, but not going to bother complaining....
Think the deciding factor will be the stock.. can't get used to the wobble on the underfolder, feels cheap,
Any way to tighten it up?
The side folder is so much nicer that way.
**** Would like to edit this, after punching out the pin and tightening the nut my side folder has 0 slop or play. Think the decision is going to be tough.. the original sa is less barrel heavy... and a nicer color wood.. but otherwise the new one looks better.****
Also ti is sending a new grip for the damge. Kudos to them
Attachments
Last edited:
