You know what was funny thing, it was decided 2 years ago, but complaint about requirement favoured P320.A post on social media from an NPF spokesperson says decision finally made and will be a Glock 45.
You know what was funny thing, it was decided 2 years ago, but complaint about requirement favoured P320.A post on social media from an NPF spokesperson says decision finally made and will be a Glock 45.
There’s Mounties out on patrol right now carrying a 5946?IMHO, Glock giving a 9mm pistol the model number "45" is kinda stupid.
Glad for the switch from the S&W 5946, though. Most city & munie agencies have been using Glocks since the early 90's. Nice for the RCMP to finally catch up.
------------
NAA.
Most RCMP members carry the old S&W 5946.There’s Mounties out on patrol right now carrying a 5946?
Safariland holster was actually part of the package, all good.Knowing this organization I fully expect us to forget to order holsters or something vital.
Time to order some switches off temu. Some stendos, 100% buying a drum mag.
Safariland 6360RDSJon will the Glock pistols be carried in the Safariland Pro III’s? I’d hope so to be able to count on member’s having years of muscle memory built up on mastering their draw and then not shooting them self in the leg/foot holstering following a high stress situation.
The Safariland also has a proven weapon retention track record. Which ultimately saves more cop’s lives than the ammo they carry.
Retraining on an entirety new system like the Serpa just doesn’t make sense therefore we won’t look surprised if the top brass
at the puzzle factory changes horses mid-stream so to speak.
Even with the Modular Beavertail Backstrap System there will be a lot of Mini-Mounties with mini-Mountie-hands that will have a hard time dealing with the large double-stack grip frame. Did Glock offer a single-stack frame solution like S&W did for the members with tiny Gypsy pick-pocket hands?
Come on grandpa, time to get you back to your room. They’re serving corn chowder today and Matlock is about to start.ugh. What's with agencies thinking that converting to tupperware and striker fired is somehow modernizing and better?
I'd insist on keeping the old S&W pistol if I were a mountie: I knew someone that used to own one, and it was one of the most ergonomic pistols I ever shot: they are a good sidearm. Same with the military: yes, the Hipowers they had were probably worn out but no patent, or at least the ability to manufacture them still under license would have produced the familiar, reliable sidearm for cheaper and zero training changes. And for the herd that wants to bleat "100yo tech"... yeah, tell that to the special forces that still roll with the 1911. The Ranger rifle and every bolt action sniper rifle is based on 1800s tech, and the reciprocating internal combustion engine still rules in the car, truck etc. Age means nothing when quality, and reliability are what you need. I'd go so far as to want a S&W 686-3 and 158gr soft points: When you can shoot ~4" groups at 30y, you only need one shot when it's substantial. Of course this is Canazuela: mediocrity is celebrated, stupidity revered, progress manipulated to lend virtue to destruction, and excellence scorned so I suppose non of this makes much sense anymore.
Come on grandpa, time to get you back to your room. They’re serving corn chowder today and Matlock is about to start.
The G45 barrel is only 102mm.Those magazines better be pinned at 10 and they better all have hand written notes from Carney saying they are allowed to bring their firearm out of the gun case every day.
Uhhhh .... because it is modernizing and better?What's with agencies thinking that converting to tupperware and striker fired is somehow modernizing and better?
It has the facade of modernizing. But Glocks have been around since 1980: plastic striker fired is over 4 decades old now. If this was beyond a facade of modernizing there would be something better, not just the same thing from 1980 with different lipstick. If selecting something that was designed less than 40yrs ago is "modernizing" and "better", the 2008 Chiappa Rhino is the future.Uhhhh .... because it is modernizing and better?
I've owned a 1911 for 40 years and competed with it for many years and a G17 is simply a better and more reliable handgun.![]()
Slide and barrel requirement, nothing to do with prohibited firearms. Surefire wasn't pick because they want nothing protruding end to snag, fit and flush to the slide and barrel.I don't know what process was followed to arrive at this outcome, but it's a definite improvement over the 5946. It's a good pistol with a fantastic closed-emitter optic. I prefer Surefire lights, but there's nothing wrong with Streamlight.
I've only had the opportunity to shoot a 5946 one time, but the trigger pull was long and heavy. The DAO pull, as I understand it, was meant to help with the transition away from revolvers... Seems like a solution looking for a problem. While the Glock trigger isn't the best ever made, it's still better than the DAO.
Does anyone know why they went with the G45 and not the G17? Is the half-inch of barrel really that much of an issue? Or was this a situation of the RCMP wanting to outfit their officers with a prohibited firearm so that they could never end up in the hands of civilians?



























