Mounties new pistol announced.

IMHO, Glock giving a 9mm pistol the model number "45" is kinda stupid.

Glad for the switch from the S&W 5946, though. Most city & munie agencies have been using Glocks since the early 90's. Nice for the RCMP to finally catch up.

------------
NAA.
There’s Mounties out on patrol right now carrying a 5946?
 
Jon will the Glock pistols be carried in the Safariland Pro III’s? I’d hope so to be able to count on member’s having years of muscle memory built up on mastering their draw and then not shooting them self in the leg/foot holstering following a high stress situation.

The Safariland also has a proven weapon retention track record. Which ultimately saves more cop’s lives than the ammo they carry.

Retraining on an entirety new system like the Serpa just doesn’t make sense therefore we won’t look surprised if the top brass
at the puzzle factory changes horses mid-stream so to speak.

Even with the Modular Beavertail Backstrap System there will be a lot of Mini-Mounties with mini-Mountie-hands that will have a hard time dealing with the large double-stack grip frame. Did Glock offer a single-stack frame solution like S&W did for the members with tiny Gypsy pick-pocket hands?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I honestly haven’t looked into that. I hope it’s the same style as we have now. I still have years of muscle memory from the leather holster that fudge me up when I try and rock my pistol out of the holster instead of pulling straight up.
 
Those magazines better be pinned at 10 and they better all have hand written notes from Carney saying they are allowed to bring their firearm out of the gun case every day.
 
Jon will the Glock pistols be carried in the Safariland Pro III’s? I’d hope so to be able to count on member’s having years of muscle memory built up on mastering their draw and then not shooting them self in the leg/foot holstering following a high stress situation.

The Safariland also has a proven weapon retention track record. Which ultimately saves more cop’s lives than the ammo they carry.

Retraining on an entirety new system like the Serpa just doesn’t make sense therefore we won’t look surprised if the top brass
at the puzzle factory changes horses mid-stream so to speak.

Even with the Modular Beavertail Backstrap System there will be a lot of Mini-Mounties with mini-Mountie-hands that will have a hard time dealing with the large double-stack grip frame. Did Glock offer a single-stack frame solution like S&W did for the members with tiny Gypsy pick-pocket hands?
Safariland 6360RDS
 
Ah the venerable leather sam browne holster complete with full coverage flap, button retainer and the futuristic swivel to ensure reliable and consistent grip acquisition every time.
 
ugh. What's with agencies thinking that converting to tupperware and striker fired is somehow modernizing and better?

I'd insist on keeping the old S&W pistol if I were a mountie: I knew someone that used to own one, and it was one of the most ergonomic pistols I ever shot: they are a good sidearm. Same with the military: yes, the Hipowers they had were probably worn out but no patent, or at least the ability to manufacture them still under license would have produced the familiar, reliable sidearm for cheaper and zero training changes. And for the herd that wants to bleat "100yo tech"... yeah, tell that to the special forces that still roll with the 1911. The Ranger rifle and every bolt action sniper rifle is based on 1800s tech, and the reciprocating internal combustion engine still rules in the car, truck etc. Age means nothing when quality, and reliability are what you need. I'd go so far as to want a S&W 686-3 and 158gr soft points: When you can shoot ~4" groups at 30y, you only need one shot when it's substantial. Of course this is Canazuela: mediocrity is celebrated, stupidity revered, progress manipulated to lend virtue to destruction, and excellence scorned so I suppose non of this makes much sense anymore.
 
ugh. What's with agencies thinking that converting to tupperware and striker fired is somehow modernizing and better?

I'd insist on keeping the old S&W pistol if I were a mountie: I knew someone that used to own one, and it was one of the most ergonomic pistols I ever shot: they are a good sidearm. Same with the military: yes, the Hipowers they had were probably worn out but no patent, or at least the ability to manufacture them still under license would have produced the familiar, reliable sidearm for cheaper and zero training changes. And for the herd that wants to bleat "100yo tech"... yeah, tell that to the special forces that still roll with the 1911. The Ranger rifle and every bolt action sniper rifle is based on 1800s tech, and the reciprocating internal combustion engine still rules in the car, truck etc. Age means nothing when quality, and reliability are what you need. I'd go so far as to want a S&W 686-3 and 158gr soft points: When you can shoot ~4" groups at 30y, you only need one shot when it's substantial. Of course this is Canazuela: mediocrity is celebrated, stupidity revered, progress manipulated to lend virtue to destruction, and excellence scorned so I suppose non of this makes much sense anymore.
Come on grandpa, time to get you back to your room. They’re serving corn chowder today and Matlock is about to start.
 
I don't know what process was followed to arrive at this outcome, but it's a definite improvement over the 5946. It's a good pistol with a fantastic closed-emitter optic. I prefer Surefire lights, but there's nothing wrong with Streamlight.

I've only had the opportunity to shoot a 5946 one time, but the trigger pull was long and heavy. The DAO pull, as I understand it, was meant to help with the transition away from revolvers... Seems like a solution looking for a problem. While the Glock trigger isn't the best ever made, it's still better than the DAO.

Does anyone know why they went with the G45 and not the G17? Is the half-inch of barrel really that much of an issue? Or was this a situation of the RCMP wanting to outfit their officers with a prohibited firearm so that they could never end up in the hands of civilians?
 
Don't everyone get too excited....The Liberals haven't spent the coin yet. There is time for them to go with a more economical solution to ensure the RCMP get an adequate solution.
Wouldn't surprise me if the chose something like this.....

Afghan “Khyber Pass” Made British-Style Martini Metford .303 Pistol - circa 1896​


Something so FUGLY....I want one....

Traditionally the British converted .450/.577 Martini Rifles to .303 caliber, often turning them into carbines at the same time. However in this case, most likely in Northern India by the Khyber Pass, this pistol was constructed using a Martini style action, locally manufactured probably entirely by hand. Occasionally original British and European parts were used when acquired.

Year of Manufacture: circa 1896
Caliber: .303 British
Cartridge Type: Centerfire Cartridge
Overall Length: 5 1/2 Inches
Overall Length: 11 1/2 Inches
Action type: Falling-Block
Feed System: Single Shot
 

Attachments

  • Martini Pistol.jpg
    Martini Pistol.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 1
  • Martini Pistol 2.jpg
    Martini Pistol 2.jpg
    73.1 KB · Views: 1
  • Martini Pistol 3.jpg
    Martini Pistol 3.jpg
    88.5 KB · Views: 1
the only thing upsetting is that they got the pistol, optic, and holster package the CAF should have got and they’re getting more of them
 
Those magazines better be pinned at 10 and they better all have hand written notes from Carney saying they are allowed to bring their firearm out of the gun case every day.
The G45 barrel is only 102mm. 🤷‍♂️


What's with agencies thinking that converting to tupperware and striker fired is somehow modernizing and better?
Uhhhh .... because it is modernizing and better? 🤷‍♂️

I've owned a 1911 for 40 years and competed with it for many years and a G17 is simply a better and more reliable handgun. 🤷‍♂️
 
Uhhhh .... because it is modernizing and better? 🤷‍♂️

I've owned a 1911 for 40 years and competed with it for many years and a G17 is simply a better and more reliable handgun. 🤷‍♂️
It has the facade of modernizing. But Glocks have been around since 1980: plastic striker fired is over 4 decades old now. If this was beyond a facade of modernizing there would be something better, not just the same thing from 1980 with different lipstick. If selecting something that was designed less than 40yrs ago is "modernizing" and "better", the 2008 Chiappa Rhino is the future.

This doesn't change the fact that there are 100yo arms designs that are still in service because they are still the best, and really the only way forward in modernizing is probably the laser.
 
I don't know what process was followed to arrive at this outcome, but it's a definite improvement over the 5946. It's a good pistol with a fantastic closed-emitter optic. I prefer Surefire lights, but there's nothing wrong with Streamlight.

I've only had the opportunity to shoot a 5946 one time, but the trigger pull was long and heavy. The DAO pull, as I understand it, was meant to help with the transition away from revolvers... Seems like a solution looking for a problem. While the Glock trigger isn't the best ever made, it's still better than the DAO.

Does anyone know why they went with the G45 and not the G17? Is the half-inch of barrel really that much of an issue? Or was this a situation of the RCMP wanting to outfit their officers with a prohibited firearm so that they could never end up in the hands of civilians?
Slide and barrel requirement, nothing to do with prohibited firearms. Surefire wasn't pick because they want nothing protruding end to snag, fit and flush to the slide and barrel.

Trigger is 6.5lb, I suspect it is the LE Trigger the Glock keeps advertising for the LE market. The trigger is not bad I shot qual with G17 Gen 5 with that type of trigger.
 
Back
Top Bottom