No, width. As in left to right, not front to back.Measures at just about 7" / 17.5 cm with my Milwaukee tape.
The three M-Lok holes are 4.5" in length total.
.
Mark
No, width. As in left to right, not front to back.Measures at just about 7" / 17.5 cm with my Milwaukee tape.
The three M-Lok holes are 4.5" in length total.
.

No, width. As in left to right, not front to back.
Mark
Thanks for posting a picture of the bottom of the foreend,
I can see why they didn't put M-lok's on the bottom for a rail.... they decided to bevel the sides down towards the bottom and thinned it out.
It looks like it's barely wide enough for a rail. It almost looks like it's tapered as well?
I can see some aftermarket fore ends rolling out if these guns run well.
View attachment 1154901
Thanks for the measurements, a good trick when measuring with a tape when you can't "hook" on the end is to measure off an inch or centimetre and subtract what ever point you decide to start with off the total....To the best of my abilities with my retractable tape measure, I measured the width of the bottom flat at 1,3 cm (13 mm).
It feels completely flat, although the stippled part is raised about 1 mm. It almost feel like it's glued or melted onto the foregrip. I tried to pry it off, but it looks & feels like it's one unit.
Indeed, a foregrip with Mlok or picatinny at the bottom would be great. All this rifle needs to kick ass even more is a vertical grip on the pump foregrip. Duke Nukem 3D shotgun style, lol!
.

I 'test' fire w/ primer only many times. Shoot into a stuffed trash bag, or a pillow, & it's not that loud at all.Yeah, I'll pass on that for now. Not sure my neighbors would appreciate lol.
If I lived out on a farm, etc. the live primer test (without powder / bullet) would've been already done!
![]()
Depending on how the plastic part mounts to the mechanism this may be something that 3D printing can solve.I can see some aftermarket fore ends rolling out if these guns run well.
Again, 3D printing would make it easy to do a custom shaped bumper pad for there.A possible solution would be to make a thin soft buffer, either out of synthetic foam (like stick-on window seal) or soft rubber. Think like a thick gasket or even a thick o-ring, essentially. This should quiet the action quite a bit.
Yes. Did not get the 12" version just so I could take it to the USA for matches. Definitely like the looks of the 12" "tacticool" version better. If they come out with a tacticool 16" version I'll probably buy it too.You have the 16” version?
A 3D printed pic rail that is shaped to the contour of the factory pump should be pretty easy, the trick is using a filament that is strong enough or doing it with metal.Depending on how the plastic part mounts to the mechanism this may be something that 3D printing can solve.
Again, 3D printing would make it easy to do a custom shaped bumper pad for there.
Mark
I was thinking of replacing the whole forearm with a new one that has an integral vertical grip or AFG. I think you'd be hard pressed to print a pic rail that would stand up to much.A 3D printed pic rail that is shaped to the contour of the factory pump should be pretty easy, the trick is using a filament that is strong enough or doing it with metal.
An aluminum rail segment bolted on as is and over hanging a few mill on each side of the flat on the bottom would be the easiest first attempt.I was thinking of replacing the whole forearm with a new one that has an integral vertical grip or AFG. I think you'd be hard pressed to print a pic rail that would stand up to much.
Mark
Had the exact same thing happen to me, taking mine to the range as I did the same as you. Even the cross threading, had a hunk almost identical. The box was also not well filled so I imagine the gun bouncing all over the place it the box didn't help






NIce work NATO!
The list of easy improvements for North Sylva to pass on to the Turks is growing.....![]()



























