saskgunowner101
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- middle of Sask
No, so I suppose that makes two of us that don't have a technical background in this new cartridge.Do you....
No, so I suppose that makes two of us that don't have a technical background in this new cartridge.Do you....
That’s alot.
all of asudden a faster bullet with higher pressure and higher heat ouput if going to be bettween??
What is the magical math and physics used to achieve in between??
NO MAGIC addition to periodic table that I have seen to cope with higher THERMODVNAMICS .
Someone at Federal heard it called the 6.5 NeedMore too many times and said “hold my beer”…….lolThey should have called em 6.5CreedMORE
Dude you didnt even spell Thermodynamics right in your origional post. Shut up. Stop acting like you know what your talking about and just say that you speculate what you said. I hate it when people talk as if what they say is fact, but I reality you dont even have the cartridge in hand. 500 rounds per barrel?? You sound like an idiot.Do you....
Dude you're insufferable. Thanks for you input now just be quiet so the rest of us can enjoy something other than a .25 weaherby or some other meaningless cartridge. Majority of hunters will never burn a barrel. And the rest of us in 2 years time will report our barrel life. Until then just stop buzz-killing everything.latter of the two...not getting far.
look at the numbers;;
Standard 6.5 Creedmoor @ 62,000 psi @
2,500 – 3,000+ rounds @ 1 barrel
versus
Standard 6.5 PRC @ 65,000 psi @ 1,100 – 1,500 rounds @ 1 barrel
versus
Federal +Peak 6.5 Creedmoor @ 80,000 psi @ Estimated under 500 rounds @ 1 barrel..
all of asudden a faster bullet with higher pressure and higher heat ouput if going to be bettween??
What is the magical math and physics used to achieve in between??
NO MAGIC addition to periodic table that I have seen to cope with higher THERMODVNAMICS .
SOMETHING TO LOOK AT...
Federal just dressed up that military technology, stamped "6.5 Creedmoor" on the box, and tried to sell it to regular hunters to squeeze extra profit out of their factory tooling.
Ahmen!Do you have a background in ^^^ all this you're talking about, or is this just your guess/thoughts, or opinion?
I agree,Ron's gain twist barrels are nowhere near extreme as these PXT barrels are.That’s alot.
Ron Smith made me a pxt barrel about 10-15 years ago… but I think he just called it a gain twist.
You cannot change peak pressure without altering the heat energy of the system.Is it a higher heat output? I don't know exactly how amount of powder burned compares to peak pressure, but if you know please explain. All other things being equal a higher peak pressure would lead to higher temps but we're not comparing things where only a single variable has changed.
It may be categorized as a barrel burner, such as the 264 Win. Mag. However, I still like the velocity it produces!6.5 Creedmoor has just turned WEATHERBY!!!!!!!!!
case material or wall thickness doesn't matter for pressure .Increased pressure over CIP level, will that mean we need to re-proof? Will this ammo get CIP approval?
All the years on here I was told it has nothing to do with the case design, material or wall thickness when it came to increasing pressures on a 6.5x55.
edi
It may be categorized as a barrel burner, such as the 264 Win. Mag. However, I still like the velocity it produces!
Stellite is incredibly brittle and nearly impossible to button-rifle or cut-rifle conventionally.I need a stellite or vitalium barrel
FEDERAL marketing....Why the Military Wants It....Extreme Reliability, No Logistic Conversions, Optimized for Suppressors, Shorter, Handier Carbines.I just don’t understand why they would do this to the 6.5 creed. It really does nothing to improve the 6.5 creed, as everyone knows it’s the only cartridge on the market that defies gravity.



























