My point is pretty simple. A points system rewards people who have been applying the longest while still giving everyone a chance. Once you draw your tag, your points reset, so over time everyone ends up drawing at about the same rate.
I'm genuinely curious what the argument against that is. If everyone has the same long-term opportunity, why oppose a points system? Is there a downside I'm missing, or is the preference just for a pure lottery?
And since we're posting definitions, I'm still not seeing how "DEI" relates to hunting tags. Maybe you could post the definition and explain how that term is related to this discussion, because I'm not seeing the connection. I'm not as well-versed in political slang as you seem to be, so maybe I'm missing something.
Here you go, straight from Wiki:
Equity refers to concepts of
fairness and
justice, such as fair compensation and
substantive equality.
[4] More specifically, equity usually also includes a focus on
societal disparities, allocating resources, "decision making authority to groups that have historically been disadvantaged",
[5] and taking "into consideration a person's unique circumstances, adjusting treatment accordingly so that the end result is equal".
Points systems take into consideration the unique circumstances of individuals (how long they've been applying/how many points they have) and adjust treatment accordingly. It's basically a textbook case of DEI in action.
Also I already explained why I'm against points systems, it rewards long time hunters by punishing new hunters. Discouraging new hunters will only make hunting in BC harder/less available over time. Hunting is also a gateway to gun ownership. Given the current political climate I think we should be doing everything in our power to encourage young people into our fold.
The IDEA of a points system isn't terrible, the problem is that everyone who gets on board after the first year or couple of years is screwed. There's 100k hunting licences bought in BC each year. If we assume only 10% of those put in for LEH, that's 10k people with max points. How long is it going to take for someone who gets in 5 years after the start of the points system to catch up to those people (and everyone who got in after year 1, year 2, etc)? A long ass time.
For context, this year there is about 600 moose tags allocated for all of Region 3 and 1400 for region 5. Oh, and 167k applications were received for the 2025 LEH. That'll be for all species, but there is only 9 or 10 species you can apply for, so 10k is likely a massive under estimate for the number of moose LEH applications in a given year.
I think they could fix a lot of the issues with LEH by tinkering with the reduced odds you get after drawing. For Moose I think its 3 years of reduced odds, and only 1 year for some other stuff? That would reduce the chances of someone pulling good tags repeatedly, without punishing new hunters.