Thanks, that's why I knew I had to share it when I saw it!That's a hell of a good pic, piper. The sense of movement is brilliant.
Thanks, that's why I knew I had to share it when I saw it!That's a hell of a good pic, piper. The sense of movement is brilliant.
This photograph captures German soldiers operating a sound detector during World War II, a device used to locate aircraft by detecting their sonic booms. The equipment, developed in the 1930s, was part of Germany's early anti-aircraft defense systems before the advent of radar.
Which aircraft were capable of creating a sonic boom in 1939? There was sound detection devices used by both sides to listen for aircraft noise in ww2. Not sonic booms though. - dan
Overview
Visual Matches
Pages with this image
Solve
This photograph captures German soldiers operating a sound detector during World War II, a device used to locate aircraft by detecting their sonic booms. The equipment, developed in the 1930s, was part of Germany's early anti-aircraft defense systems before the advent of radar.
rarehistoricalphotos.com
Aircraft Detection Before Radar: Old Photos from 1917-1940 - Rare ...
reddit.com
Sound location equipment in Germany, 1939. It was used to determine the ...
bearhunter, you OK? This kinda reads like you've had a stroke and are relying on AI to respond to threads... Very much NOT in character.
Overview
Visual Matches
Pages with this image
Solve
This photograph captures German soldiers operating a sound detector during World War II, a device used to locate aircraft by detecting their sonic booms. The equipment, developed in the 1930s, was part of Germany's early anti-aircraft defense systems before the advent of radar.
rarehistoricalphotos.com
Aircraft Detection Before Radar: Old Photos from 1917-1940 - Rare ...
reddit.com
Sound location equipment in Germany, 1939. It was used to determine the ...
The Don was designed to meet Air Ministry Specification T.6/36 for a multi-role trainer and was a single-engined monoplane of wooden stressed-skin construction. The DH.93 Don was intended to be a trainer for pilots and radio operators, and as a gunnery trainer, the gunnery requirement involved the mounting of a dorsal gun turret. Student pilot and instructor sat side by side up front, while accommodation for a trainee WT (radio) operator and the turret gunner was behind in the cabin.
The prototype with test marks E-3 (later military serial number L2387) first flew on 18 June 1937 and was transferred to RAF Martlesham Heath for official evaluation. In the course of the trials, more equipment was added which increased the weight, and as a result, in an attempt to reduce weight, the dorsal turret was removed. The aircraft was also modified with small auxiliary fins fitted beneath the tailplane.
Despite the changes incorporated from the fifth aircraft, the type was deemed not suitable for training and the original order for 250 aircraft was reduced to only 50 aircraft, 20 of which were delivered as engineless airframes for ground training. The remaining aircraft served as communications and liaison aircraft, serving with No. 24 Sqn and numerous RAF Station Flights throughout the UK until early 1939, but all were grounded for use as instructional airframes in March 1939.
Just wait until the new "elbow up" Canadian demonstration team comes thundering across your air-show flight line...that auta be a thriller!!! Think I'll dub them "The Albatross-Birds" or "goony -birds" if you prefer. This could actually be compared to driving an actual thump-thump "muscle car" to a "bzzzz rice burner" the boys are forced to drive now.I'd heard the Harvards sounded like they do because of a reduction gear between the driveshaft and the prop. Could well be bullsh!t, but that's what I heard.
I recall an announcer at an airshow (wish they'd say less) talking about a flight of four Harvards going over. "You'll note that four Harvards are no noiser than a single Harvard. That's because one Harvard makes all the noise there is..."
For a truly loud prop, I believe the record is held by the XF-84H, nicknamed the "Thunderscreech".
![]()
![]()
Not unattractive, but just horrible in most practical regards, the foremost sin being the noise generated by the prop tips going supersonic. Plenty of stories online about it if you're interested.
I've seen a few that could manage it. Some of those military modelers are incredibly talented. - danIt'd take a talented model maker to get that look with an airbrush. TONS of character in those old ladies.
well that's one way of describing hydraulic leaks.... "tons of character", 38 and 40 year old survivors... of a single purchaseIt'd take a talented model maker to get that look with an airbrush. TONS of character in those old ladies.



























