Anything in the .223 or .308 range is a reasonable comparison IMO. 7.62x39 only ever won out on price at best and that is becoming less of a thing fairly quickly. In a mini-action rifle it can be handy but I would take 6.5 Grendel, 6mm ARC, .300BLK and maybe a few others long before I purposely picked the x39.Care to elaborate ? Honestly whats even comparable to 7.62x39 outside of 30-30 and 300 Black Out ?
So only if you neck it down massively. Which is a fair argument as those rounds do seem superior in many ways.Anything in the .223 or .308 range is a reasonable comparison IMO. 7.62x39 only ever won out on price at best and that is becoming less of a thing fairly quickly. In a mini-action rifle it can be handy but I would take 6.5 Grendel, 6mm ARC, .300BLK and maybe a few others long before I purposely picked the x39.
Apples to apples, the price for good ammo across that range is essentially identical. 6mm ARC is more capable at 1000m than 7.62x39 is at 500. It's all but obsolete. I still like it, I still shoot it but I have a hard time ignoring it's shortcomings when comparing it to almost anything.
or was the crate paying the sks lol ... sold all my 7.62x39 and it took over 2 years to end all ... i had a few but seems people did not want to pay regular price cant imagine the price they would have to pay today lol ... now 5.56 and 223 no way to leave the home lolJesus, I remember getting a free crate with an sks purchase
Good thing I still got a couple full crates kicking around for emergency purposes
No way Iād spend 700 plus on surplus corrosive, I would just reload my own for less and it would be non corrosive



























