Husqvarna Sporting Rifles #### - ALL MODELS!!!

If you run a finger over it, is it like a deep divot or dimple, or is it fairly shallow? Does it catch your fingernail when you scrape across it?

If it doesn't, it's definitely not a punch or proof mark.
I've seen marks like the one in your pic. IMHO, it's from being dropped on a sharp pointed object.

What it was dropped on is lost in the past, but ####e happens, and your pic is proof.
 
Why is it not pointed out in the sellers advertising/products description for e.g. 9.3x57.

"No factory ammo in Canada available" at this time.

"Wallhanger only" unless you want to spend more than rifle value on reloading equipment

Bolt is not original, sights are crooked and receiver is tapped out of centre (but that only comes because the stock is shot out).


It's unbelievable what people buy into these days.

But DoGY owns a few - that's the ultimate approval!

Maybe you guys should give your head a good shake 🪇
You're the one that needs to give his head a shake.

I happen to know several Europeans who still use different vintage Mauser variants to hunt with, and none of them feel undergunned or outclassed.

You go on about having to reload, big deal, for some of us, it's all part of the allure of these fine rifles.

You seem to think only you can decide what is a good quality firearm.

Well, you can, for YOU, but the rest of us will just carry on carrying on and use these fine old rifles as they were intended.
 
I've seen some crazy stuff, but there is a HVA 1900 in 300 Win, bare bones just listed on the EE, for $1650 lol.
The sales pitch is pretty used car salesman type, but if that sells for that price, I may grab dozens of them off Intersurplus and double my money lol.
It will take you decades of shopping to find dozens of them in 300 win mag at intersurplus
 
Question for you Husqvarna guys. I have a chance at a Husqvarna 1640 lightweight in 30-06 20.5 inch barrel i think. Originally iron sights with front hood still intact. Stock is a very light colored wood with no cracks and great bluing. Im guessing beech wood? I rate the condition 8 out of 10. What would a ballpark value be on something like that?
 
I have owned several of these over the past 40 years or so. Every one was light, easy to point and swing, and very accurate.

The only problem with them is that short barrel limits the velocity available and increases the muzzle blast significantly.

Ted
 
I have owned several of these over the past 40 years or so. Every one was light, easy to point and swing, and very accurate.

The only problem with them is that short barrel limits the velocity available and increases the muzzle blast significantly.

Ted
Thanks Ted. I've had a few 30-06 carbine over the years as well. Would you know a rough value of the 1640 lightweight model? From my research there definitely seems to be alot less lightweight models compared to the standard 24 inch barrel models.

Mike
 
husqvarna .366.jpg

1937 Husqvarna 96 Mauser 9.3x57 stalking rifle accompanied me on a grouse hunt on the high ridges the other day, slung over my back whilst packing the shotgun. (Just in case - have bear tag.) Did some work this past summer on this one, reshaping of wood and steel, recoil pad, Skinner peep site, refinish. Such a slender, good-shooting little rifle. Looks even down to the details of action, trigger guard and floorplate like an early Rigby 275 (as they do), but even more svelte.
 
Nice old rifle ,you inspired me to take a few pics of my old 9.3x57 Husqvarna.Anyone tell me the year and model of this rifle.
 

Attachments

  • 9684BF0E-74A7-469B-9350-CB56CEB4059E.jpeg
    9684BF0E-74A7-469B-9350-CB56CEB4059E.jpeg
    120.6 KB · Views: 10
  • F4923CB2-98A0-42AF-BBA0-9B650827F4D2.jpeg
    F4923CB2-98A0-42AF-BBA0-9B650827F4D2.jpeg
    112.4 KB · Views: 10
  • FD52CA10-3C74-429B-AD8C-DD0698415285.jpeg
    FD52CA10-3C74-429B-AD8C-DD0698415285.jpeg
    97.5 KB · Views: 11
  • E1FE43E3-2C54-489B-828B-1B47C78CC9A5.jpeg
    E1FE43E3-2C54-489B-828B-1B47C78CC9A5.jpeg
    133.4 KB · Views: 11
  • 09861FD3-8826-4B3F-BED2-12DFC7278337.jpeg
    09861FD3-8826-4B3F-BED2-12DFC7278337.jpeg
    108.2 KB · Views: 11
  • 3B5031CF-E91B-4EEE-AD82-B1C475B96F19.jpeg
    3B5031CF-E91B-4EEE-AD82-B1C475B96F19.jpeg
    101.3 KB · Views: 10
  • 999C06D6-3AD8-4709-AE34-E7FC6F6217AE.jpeg
    999C06D6-3AD8-4709-AE34-E7FC6F6217AE.jpeg
    80.1 KB · Views: 10
  • 8EB157B2-5F08-41BF-B203-606D8AFEDB22.jpeg
    8EB157B2-5F08-41BF-B203-606D8AFEDB22.jpeg
    112.4 KB · Views: 9
  • 45DA290D-FCD2-4776-B893-5E5BBF1CA895.jpeg
    45DA290D-FCD2-4776-B893-5E5BBF1CA895.jpeg
    105.1 KB · Views: 10
  • Like
Reactions: DGY
Thanks Ted. I've had a few 30-06 carbine over the years as well. Would you know a rough value of the 1640 lightweight model? From my research there definitely seems to be alot less lightweight models compared to the standard 24 inch barrel models.

Mike
I have one and a friend has one in 308, mine is w/o forehand checkering but hers have the forehand checkering. We both paid around $800, for pretty much mint rifles.
 
Back
Top Bottom