Why in heaven's name would anybody consider a gun, which can so easily malfunction, to be a good gun? I mean, if this gun was designed to be used in battle, shouldn't it work every time even if you can't hold it like Hulk would? I'd love to see how many of these manly men Glock junkies would still be holding their glocks in such a manly manner, if they were wounded and had to fight it out shooting weak handed. Ridiculous!
A good gun shouldn't be so sensitive to how it is held, especially if it's a fighting gun. And if it is, it certainly isn't anywhere near "perfect".
Here's a little test for you (see the videos below); which handgun would you choose to get into a fight? I'd take old warhorse every time myself, but that is just me. Maybe I'm just too prejudiced from having grown up with people who actually did use their sidearms in real battle, not just people who watched their Tupperware Queens being portrayed in movies where their imaginary virtues have been extolled ad nauseum.
h ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsewsolPyBU
h ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jh9JhCyFFxA
Perfection alright!