it is not a snipe, it is a fact... ontario has many "regional" *dpa organizations... they have a lower overhead and for the most part "borrowed" IDPA's rule book so they have less cost to incur.
Yup. Lower overhead, due to cheap targets and less bureaucracy. The club reflects the desires of the membership. IDPA was desired at EESA by it's members.
However, some of the questions that arise for practices are:
How many targets does your club go through in practice nights?
What about uprights/target holders?
Do you have a half dozen people shooting or three dozen shooting?
My club holds only a few ODPL matches a year (well not last year...

), yet we have weekly practice nights and quarterly mini-matches. The fees of these matches would not cover the usage of purchased targets.
However, since we make our own targets, our club can afford stands, patches, patch guns and save some funds for props and steel targets every few years.
if you want to be cheap, and never plan on participating in an international or US match then those are better options for your club.... end of story.
You mean if you want to participate in an IDPA match. Many people around my area who shoot ODPL also shoot multi-gun matches that are held in the USA. No need to belong to IDPA to do that. Of course it is a different discipline (opposed to handgun only).
Sorry for the thread derail, but when it goes from a cost/"buy Canadian" argument to "the other shooting disciplines are cheaper because" was not required.
That being said, if IDPA requires official targets for anything above a practice night, then those are the rules. Nothing says where they have to come from; that is up to the individual clubs.