I put a Boyds Thumbhole stock on my Marlin 795 -it looks good, shoots good and feels good-it would be close to perfect-IF they would do something about that AWFUL trigger.Funny-I shot a 30 year old marlin .22 that has a trigger way better...
597's have a tarnished reputation, largely as a result of Remington's shoddy QC.
First, they had mag issues with early generations of magazines. They resolved this with the 3rd gen metal mags. This alone caused a tarnished reputation. Never mind the guide rod screws being too tight from the factory, causing many more FTE's.
Then, the .17HMR model was discontinued and owners got a slap in the face $200 offer. More tarnish.
Frankly, they're misunderstood, but an absolutely solid rifle. Just make sure the guide rod screws aren't too tight, and avoid the 30 round magazines, and its pretty reliable. Add a VQ hammer and extractor, and you're golden. They give 10/22's a run for their money.
Well....I just put in an order for a 795...thats for the input everyone!
Pretty happy that it came in way under budget, only $140 plus tax/shipping but had a $25 mail in rebate. Worse comes to worse, it'll be a great starter gun for my son.

I doubt you'll be disappointed. Even with the trigger that takes a bit of getting used to, it'll still shoot tighter than the competition. You'll have to give us a review once you make it out to the range with it!
![]()
For sure...there must be some mods or a trigger job that I can do to make that better?
Not to hijack, but how do owners like their 597s? I've been thinking about picking one of those up. Reliability, accuracy, overall value, etc.
i have a base model 597. I love it. The stock sights are great and mine has never had a jam or feeding issue. Id say it shoots damn well for a 180$ gun. I know alot of people here hate them, but personally i love mine and my best friend has had nothing but good things to say about his.



























