9mm big enough?

Try to get a wilderness permit with an auto. Not happening in BC. I guess somebody forgot to tell the CFO that revolvers were obsolete.

Take Care

Bob

When I was applying for my Wilderness ATC I was told by the CFO office that although hard, it was not impossible to get approved for an automatic. I was applying for one with my 1911 .45 ACP. The only reason I didn't follow through was because they needed a specific date on when I'd need it and I didn't have a specific date to give.
 
Umm why? A human assailant would be shooting back and a bullet is faster than a bear.

A bipedal assailant may simply have a knife; a bear is going to be coming toward you at fifty clicks. Also, most would-be home-invaders, etc. have seen so many TV shows and movies that racking a slide will be interpreted as "do not touch/GTFO." Still, a 12ga. is far more intimidating, and it is better to make a person flee one's home without even having to fire a shot.

Also, revolvers can handle ballistically more efficient (for killing large animals) rounds, like hardcast wadcutters. And even a 10mm won't come near the energy of a .454 Casull.

If carrying concealed handguns was legal for mere mortals in Canada (e.g., not just judges, Crown Prosecutors, etc.), I might consider a pistol...but I would rotate the ammo out monthly, as close proximity to one's body will eventually harm primers. Again, the ability of a revolver to simply ignore a dud round with a trigger pull is a huge plus.
 
If carrying concealed handguns was legal for mere mortals in Canada (e.g., not just judges, Crown Prosecutors, etc.), I might consider a pistol...but I would rotate the ammo out monthly, as close proximity to one's body will eventually harm primers. Again, the ability of a revolver to simply ignore a dud round with a trigger pull is a huge plus.

Please go on about how your ambient body temperature negatively effects the primer.
 
9mm, 45 acp are all weak rounds. You throw a 308 win in there and you got a winner... They just don't come in a small handgun package... Shot placement is aways the key and how fast someone can get to the hospital if they get there fast enough they have high odds of surviveing 3 out of 10 people shot with a handgun die. That means 7 out of 10 live. Now switch to a rifle or shotgun and the numbers change allot. 2 out of 10 people shot with a rifle live and 8 out of 10 die. It's 30 percent pistols 80 percent rifle and shotguns. The way a firearm kills someone is by bleeding or destroy a vital organ like the brain or heart. Is a 9mm a weak caliber yes it is can it still kill someone defeantly is it the best round for everything no thats why the military uses rifles and the pistol is a backup.

Here is a video that goes through the stats ect

Yes, but that wasn't even the question of the OP. Few people need a MD to tell them that rifle rounds are more reliable to kill BG than pistol rounds.
 
A bipedal assailant may simply have a knife; a bear is going to be coming toward you at fifty clicks.

A human may simply have a gun.... :rolleyes:

And yeah you expect to hit a bear running at you with 6 rounds fired from a revolver?

And even a 10mm won't come near the energy of a .454 Casull.[/youtube]

Let me tell you a secret, a .454 Casull doesn't have the amount of energy at .30-30 winchester round does. And I've personally seen .30-30 rounds that ricocheted off a Black Bear skulls. At one point the head of the bear was only 2 feet from the muzzle.

but I would rotate the ammo out monthly, as close proximity to one's body will eventually harm primers.

And any credibility you MIGHT have had goes out the window... please... enlighten us on this topic further.....
 
but one thing about an automatic, they are a lot quicker to reload... unless you're Jerry Miculek :D

I can't think of many problems that couldn't be dealt with, using 6 rounds...

15417847-close-up-of-a-loaded-357-magnum-revolver.jpg


Then again, I live in a pretty quite part of tow... and the wife could also provide covering fire while I reload... ;)
 
Well, I wouldn't want to stand in front of a 22 short if that is any indication of my feelings.

+1. John Lott has indicated that ~98% of defensive gun uses in the US involve no shots fired at all, simply presenting a firearm was enough to send the bad guy running. For the other 2%, you have to be committed to using whatever gun you have or you are in serious trouble.


Even worse - the idea of pointing the gun at someone and hoping to scare him off.

See above, Lott says that 98% of DGU's do not involve a round being fired, presenting a gun was enough. It is a very bad idea to count on that, however. If you have a gun to use in self defense you better be prepared to use it for the 2% who don't run away.


Do you get the felling your post went over everyones head?

Reading comprehension is not a big thing on CGN.


Even 7.62 is big enough ...the proper 7.62 that is :)

Indeed, the right 7.62 is clearly the winner in the 9mm vs. everything else debate. Not very holsterable, though.


Try to get a wilderness permit with an auto. Not happening in BC. I guess somebody forgot to tell the CFO that revolvers were obsolete.

Take Care

Bob

Is that a preference for 19th century technology or simply because there are very few semi's in large enough calibers to be considered reasonable for wildlife defense? Has anyone asked about carrying a Desert Eagle in .44 Mag?


I thought the lint thing did that rather well lol

Shawn

+1. That kind of took the wind out of his sails for me. The primer theory just finished the job.


Mark
 
ATC with a D eagle? If the first round didn't take him out, he for sure would get you as you attempt to clear the ensuing malfunction....
 
Why would you apply for an ATC for a .45ACP pistol, when you have such a low opinion of the .454 Casull?

What leads you to think that you would have enough time, to get off even SIX, WELL AIMED shots?

Sorry, I just had to ask Eh!:)

A human may simply have a gun.... :rolleyes:

And yeah you expect to hit a bear running at you with 6 rounds fired from a revolver?

And even a 10mm won't come near the energy of a .454 Casull.[/youtube]

Let me tell you a secret, a .454 Casull doesn't have the amount of energy at .30-30 winchester round does. And I've personally seen .30-30 rounds that ricocheted off a Black Bear skulls. At one point the head of the bear was only 2 feet from the muzzle.



And any credibility you MIGHT have had goes out the window... please... enlighten us on this topic further.....

When I was applying for my Wilderness ATC I was told by the CFO office that although hard, it was not impossible to get approved for an automatic. I was applying for one with my 1911 .45 ACP. The only reason I didn't follow through was because they needed a specific date on when I'd need it and I didn't have a specific date to give.
 
Why would you apply for an ATC for a .45ACP pistol, when you have such a low opinion of the .454 Casull?

Just to see if I could be approved. I don't have a low opinion of any gun if you can place well aimed shots at something. Being charged by a bear though isn't the best time to rely upon a side arm :p

What leads you to think that you would have enough time, to get off even SIX, WELL AIMED shots?

Most couldn't even get off three well placed shots. That is also the problem with handgun for bear defense, they aren't a stable platform as a long gun. The size of round you need for a viable bear defense means a lot of recoil to handle on a sidearm :D

And yeah you expect to hit a bear running at you with 6 rounds fired from a revolver?

Never said I did... where did you read that?

I'm not anti revolver, they have their place! ;)
 
If I wanted to shoot into space with a 9mm, would I use a flat point, jsp, fmj or 9mm boat tail? What grain wood be best to get the highest altitude


You would need a 124 grain FMJ.......tracer rounds.

That way you can see your shots trailing off into the stratosphere while blasting the Scorpion's "Rock you like a Hurricane"

in the background would be the cast of Sons of Guns......even the swamp donkey
 
Back
Top Bottom