I heard that the new line of leupold VX-3 are comparable in opticaly than the Zeiss conquest line ?
I also have a Zeiss conquest 6.5-20X50mm on my REM 700 (.308W) and the optic is very good, clear and precise for the price, under 1K$ and 1"tube.
I had in the past a leupold vari-X-III and the optic was not comparable to the zeiss, the optic was more yellowish.
At the stand, i had the chance to see thru a leupold VX-III and it was yellowish to !
There's a difference between vari-X-III, VX-III and VX-3.
So maybe i will go to swarsorki z5 in the futur, but the price is 2/3 time the price of my conquest, so does the optic quality is 2/3 time better than a Zeiss ?
THX everyones, sorry for my english skills...
Jujutsu
I also have a Zeiss conquest 6.5-20X50mm on my REM 700 (.308W) and the optic is very good, clear and precise for the price, under 1K$ and 1"tube.
I had in the past a leupold vari-X-III and the optic was not comparable to the zeiss, the optic was more yellowish.
At the stand, i had the chance to see thru a leupold VX-III and it was yellowish to !
There's a difference between vari-X-III, VX-III and VX-3.
So maybe i will go to swarsorki z5 in the futur, but the price is 2/3 time the price of my conquest, so does the optic quality is 2/3 time better than a Zeiss ?
THX everyones, sorry for my english skills...
Jujutsu


















































