Recently I've been hearing about CFO's refusing RPAL renewals if the holder doesn't own any restricteds.
One case the CFO arbitrarily downgraded a RPAL to a PAL. The person didn't notice until he went to buy a revolver and realized his licence just had non restricteds.
When the people affected called to see WTF was going on, they were told they had no restricteds registered to them, so they no longer need an RPAL.
My buddy I hunt with has not resticted's and they frowned on it, wanted him to downgrade. He just told them he might be wanting it for armored car work if he could find a job in that field. Worked ok. I can't see it fair to downgrade it without consent.




















































