And quoting using wikipedia as a referance doesn't help much.
There is more than one source for this common knowledge.
As I said before, why do you think companies keep coming out with new and improved STANAG mags with and anti-tilt followers and different funky colored followers???? Come to think of it, if STANAG mags are so awesome, why did MAGPUL even design the PMAG in the first place???? I mean the existing STANAG mags were working just fine according to you guys, so why is the PMAG so popular??? Because of the inherent flaws found in STANAG mags. I don't just make this stuff up as I go along ye know! Take it or leave it but it is what it is.
Because the magazines were originally designed to be disposable items rarely if ever used more than a few times, they have been trying to "fix" them without changing the general design since the beginning.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/12/16/new-us-army-m16-tan-magazine/
New US Army M16 “Tan” Magazine
I first mentioned the new “Tan” M16/M4 magazine back in June.
The Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier agency has just blogged about it …
“With the improved magazines, we’re taking weapons reliability up another notch,” said LTC Chris Lehner, Product Manager Individual Weapons. “By incorporating a heavier, more corrosion resistant spring, along with a new follower design that does not tilt inside the casing, our engineers were able to develop a magazine that presents a round to the weapon with even greater stability. Increased magazine reliability results in overall improved weapon system performance.”
…
“Soldiers can remember it like this: ‘Tan – is the plan. Green – start to lean. Black – take it back,’” said LTC Lehner. “While the improved magazines increase reliability to an even greater degree, the new magazines by no means reduce the importance of Soldiers keeping their weapons clean and lubricated appropriately for the environment. Also, Soldiers must be proficient on conducting immediate action (SPORTS) if their weapon has a stoppage.”
The Army has also developed a nifty tool to check if the feed lips are worn out. It is kind of a no-go gauge for magazines. If this does not already exist for civilians or law enforcement, I imagine it would be a popular accessory.
I don't get why you would do that with a $3000 plus rifle.
That's why I don't buy used...
A lot of people don't get why I felt I had to do it. Some people call me a crazy SOB, well guess what, I'm a crazy SOB!!!! I work hard for my money, so I should spend it on whatever I want, no matter how crazy someone else thinks it is.
And as far as buying used, I paid $2800 for the rifle, you can buy a new one for $3800(with taxes and shipping), you decide

I would never sell a rifle that's been through what this one has (At least not without replacing key parts). I've shot this one far too much anyway, it's got over 6000, maybe even close to 7000 rounds through it now. Plus it's the only one I have left. It stays with me forever, I even ordered a spare complete bolt from Switzerland with a matching serial number, this way I have a spare for when on courses (I had an issues on a course once with a broken extractor spring, rifle didn't go down, I finished the course, but it was close). A new barrel is in the works someday soon too, I regret selling my 1 in 10" Twist, so will switch back to that instead of a 1 in 7" twist.