Can anyone shed any light on the subject?
Here is what I suspect. In no way am I claiming that this is fact.
The first batch of 58s that came in were made using original selective fire receivers. The receivers had never been assembled into rifles, so the modifications to semi only were considered to be part of the production sequence. The RCMP confirmed from the manufacturer that this was the origin of the receivers, and approved the rifles as semi auto. The balance of the parts were new or used, as available.
IF, and this is a big IF, any of the rifles imported were made by altering finished rifles to semi only, the resulting rifles would be Converted Auto. Grandfathered CAs are 12-3 prohibited, if registered before the cut off date. Any made after the date are just plain prohibited.
IF this scenario is correct, some of the rifles in circulation are acceptable semi autos, while others might be CAs.
It will take some time to get this sorted out.
Hmmmm, sounds about right.Here is what I suspect. In no way am I claiming that this is fact.
The first batch of 58s that came in were made using original selective fire receivers. The receivers had never been assembled into rifles, so the modifications to semi only were considered to be part of the production sequence. The RCMP confirmed from the manufacturer that this was the origin of the receivers, and approved the rifles as semi auto. The balance of the parts were new or used, as available.
IF, and this is a big IF, any of the rifles imported were made by altering finished rifles to semi only, the resulting rifles would be Converted Auto. Grandfathered CAs are 12-3 prohibited, if registered before the cut off date. Any made after the date are just plain prohibited.
IF this scenario is correct, some of the rifles in circulation are acceptable semi autos, while others might be CAs.
It will take some time to get this sorted out.
Rumors. Not many facts.
Just remember folks... Wars are won 'one battle at a time'... This type of 'prohibition by incrementalism' WILL CONTINUE unless we have a fair & common sense rewrite of the Firearms Act!!!
Cheers
Jay
You are probably correct...
...If I'm not mistaken, around 2009/2010(time of the now infamous report) - Didn't Marstar have some VZ58(L?)s classed as prohibited because they were made from surplus parts (i.e. converted FAs? - or some such thing)...
...And at that time it was said the cz858s/czh2003 models were NOT affected because they were built as "newly manufactured" using "semi-only" parts?
Unless it comes from wolverine or a direct importer it's just rumor. If someone from wolverine wants to provide any clarity that would be great, but so far as I understand it, they have a bunch of the rifles sitting at the border. That's the extent of what I know. Why they have em could be trying to find an excuse to reclassify, maybe they're just being extra thorough in attempt to draw it out. I don't think the CSA produced rifles have gotten the same amount of attention. Wait and see for the time being. No need to panic yet.
Don't rely on information from an importer in order to get active about your rights.
A wait and see attitude may not be the best approach, if you want to stop a review on the CZ and VZ then fight for the Swiss and KRISS now.
"I'm sorry officer? What cz-858? Oh, that one. I sold that almost a year ago."
Wow, I do not like where things are going. The one rifle at a time comment is right. It doesn't matter whether it's a rifle you own, don't own, or never want to own, we need to speak up.
No official word from the RCMP, and I'd hope if the importer for cz's knew anything they would speak up like the other importers involved in the Swiss arms and kriss have.
Wolverine imports the 858's, if your seeing any of the multiple panic threads on the subject please give us a little bit of truth.



























