Nothing, but the Z3 3-9x36 is only a few oz heavier and is a much, much nicer scope. IMO it is very easily worth the extra weight.
Really ? Z 3 is that a Zeiss model ? Sorry, I'm not familiar with that one, please tell us more.
Nothing, but the Z3 3-9x36 is only a few oz heavier and is a much, much nicer scope. IMO it is very easily worth the extra weight.
Really ? Z 3 is that a Zeiss model ? Sorry, I'm not familiar with that one, please tell us more.

Ok, Thanks for that.
I have a 1.5-6 X 42 Habicht and really like it... amazing clarity.
I will look into that, Thank - you both for the tip.

The windage turret on my VX-3 would get dinged on occasion by an empty case, the lower profile and different position of the turrets on the Swaro keeps them clear of ejecting cases.
Or one could simple rotate the scope 90* to the left so the windage turret is now the elevation and vis-versa. Right and Left now become Raise and Lower, and the windage is simple to figure out with the up and down marks in the horizontal plane. This works so well that I've changed most of my scope over this way. It's also amazing how much difference not having an adjustment turret in the way makes when loading the magazine from the top.
Give it an honest try, and I bet you won't go back.
Thanks for the info & pics Sun_and_Steel, I'm going to seriously look into that.
Really that's a nice looking combination !
Nope,1899 is talking Swaro. I recently switched out the Leupold VX-3 on my NULA to an earlier model Swarovski 3-9X36mm Habicht with a BDC reticle. Really nice scope in the mountains. Prices on the EE for this model are comparable to the newer VX-3's. Brighter glass and more forgiving eyebox in my experience as well.
A slip on some loose scree put a large dent in the eyepiece of my scope,so I contacted Swarovski and they paid for shipping both ways to New York and replaced the eyepiece as well as servicing the whole scope.
Bear in mind that this was 10-15 year old glass I bought second hand off the EE with no original receipt,turnaround time for the repair was a couple weeks.
Leupolds warranty is legendary, but anyone who says Swaros warranty isn't as good is out to lunch.
![]()
glad to hear that good news from the US side of this wonderful company ... in Europe for sure he won`t be free ...
but the combo suggested by 1899 is something to think about.
what kind of reticle is available for the z3 3-9x36?
My preference bucks the current trend and certainly this thread... I detest light rifles... My shooting (offhand) is much better with a more weighty rifle... And preferably a short, weighty rifle... Granted I am predominantly an Ontario hunter... My opinion might change if I had to hike a kilometer vertically... I hike miles now with pack and rifle and through some tough terrain and over Ontario hills, but these "hills" are laughable to you Western folk.




Great photo Boomer! What mountain range was that picture taken in?
Sun_and_Steel - Keep in mind that the Habicht AV, which is the immediate predecessor to the Z3, has an aluminum body whereas I believe some (all?) of the Habicht Nova 3-9x36 has steel bodies, so they will be significantly heavier.
I didn't realize the NOVA was a steel tube, Swarovski told me my A model was late '90's, so if the NOVA pre-dates that one it must be old. I wonder if the steel ocular bell would have fared better in my fall?
The scope I was suggesting to Kevan is a Z3, it's for the same price as the NOVA he has pictured in the ad 630$.
I'd link the EE ad but I'm thinking thats against the rules or something. I have no affiliation with the seller I just think that little scope suits a NULA/Forbes like peanut butter and jelly,especially if you consider the majority of VX-3's for sale on the EE are 500$ and above, that's not even with a B&C reticle half the time.
Not knocking Leupolds but the optical quality between a Z3 and a VX-3 is well worth an extra hundred bucks.




























