Agreed.
And if it's not them, it's the Russians.
A few years back I was travelling around Croatia and remember talking to an old timer about how the whole war there started. According to him, out of the blue one day, the whole town of Dubrovnik was watching these guys hauling gear up to the top of the hill above town wondering what was going on. After a bit, phosphorus shells started raining down on the city and no one even had any guns to fight with. No warning - nothing.
It was his opinion (and I found out later, the general feeling in town) that the whole thing smelled like CIA. He said it took a bit, but they were eventually able to get the Italians and French to sell them guns to fight with.
The Americans do have a well-documented push to militarize the globe on their terms and that means that even some old Warsaw Pact countries are up for grabs. Don't know if I buy it, but I've read that some countries actually welcome a fixed military presence because it can be a huge boom for suffering local economies. Personnel eat, drink, shop, etc.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-worldwide-network-of-us-military-bases/5564
With Americans moving into the old neighbourhood, I could see the Russians getting nervous and not wanting to lose a war of "influence" so close to home. On that note it would seem, for the time being, at least, that Yanukovych is the Russian's puppet and marching to their tune.
Either way, it's the people of Ukraine that are suffering the consequences - let's hope it ends well for them.
One thing I've always admired about the folks out there is that once the line is crossed and they get pissed, they start breaking sh!^. Seems like they don't want to, but they will if they have to.
Whereas here it seems just bend over and take whatever is given to us.
Either way, the end result is that these poor Ukrainians are caught in the middle