10/22 Custom Receivers

dont forget if you buy a receiver that has the rail built in, you will not be able to use it in kits such as nordic, fs556, or evo.
Thats why i would want one that has no rail. I do like the flat look.
 
aftermidnight said:
Any news? Are they here yet?? :D
Click to expand...
Yes, sir, they are here.

Made In Canada

integral picatinny rail (14 grooves),
thicker top for increased rigidity,
flared ejection port in the upper half without compromising the rigidity,
tighter fit of the bolt and trigger group,
it accepts the slip-fit barrel.
No second hold down.
22LR only.


Some pics of the first production receivers:
dar22_002.jpg

dar22_003.jpg


dar22_022.jpg

dar22_024.jpg

dar22_025.jpg

dar22_028.jpg

dar22_029.jpg




Beside an OEM Ruger receiver:

dar22_031.jpg







Go Canada!
 
Last edited:
savage express said:
Awsome, Nice work.
What is the exact weight differences of the two?
Click to expand...
I do not know the exact difference in weight.
Why are people so interested in the difference in weight?
On a trigger pull gage this receiver measures about 10 oz and
the OEM Ruger measures about 6.4 oz.







62bravorecon said:
FABSPORTS made some ! they're called FS556 !!!!!
Click to expand...
Fabsports do not make receivers. FS556 is a stock kit.

This one (in my pictures) is the first and only aftermarket 10/22 production receiver in Canada.




anthonyfrechette said:
Those look great! :D

Where can we buy and how much?
Click to expand...
I think the promo (introductory) price is $149.
I am not sure about the regular price.
 
Last edited:
The price was mentioned above but you forgot to mention where we can get one? :) I think that look amazing!!

Oh, will there be a Stainless one available that's not an 80% but fully complete?
 
I think Dlask did a nice job. BUT!!! I still have a concern about how it would sit in a stock as the receiver is not contoured in the rear, like I said before Dr. Lector removed the pic with it sitting in the stock and it just didn't look like it sat right. So even though I really like the final product from dlask, I would still like to see it bedded in a stock before I order one.
 
Brocolt said:
I think Dlask did a nice job. BUT!!! I still have a concern about how it would sit in a stock as the receiver is not contoured in the rear, like I said before Dr. Lector removed the pic with it sitting in the stock and it just didn't look like it sat right. So even though I really like the final product from dlask, I would still like to see it bedded in a stock before I order one.
Click to expand...

+1. Not contoured could lead to problems. Lets see pics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom