.223 for everything, the gunnutz version

I’ve gone through a fair bit of experimentation using different bullet construction, from mono’s to match. I can’t recommend match bullets or monolithic. Although my experience using match bullets were in .30 caliber, maybe the smaller caliber bullets exhibit better penetration.
I shot a mule deer at 330m with a 208gr A-Max and the bullet hit on the ribs and did not enter the chest cavity. It did however dislocate the shot side front leg and pretty much destroyed the meat in both front quarters. The skinned carcass looked like it was involved in a collision with a vehicle.
I’m still evolving on this but the classic cup and core, partition, bonded bullets seem to deliver the most consistent performance.
 
The monos we've been shooting animals with here have all done well. Not seeing any justification for a blanket "can't recommend" at all, tbh.

As for match bullets, it bears repeating that this thread really mentions a few in particular with a "not endorsing anything else" criteria attached and emphasis on real world results being excellent.
 
I shot a mule deer at 330m with a 208gr A-Max and the bullet hit on the ribs and did not enter the chest cavity. It did however dislocate the shot side front leg and pretty much destroyed the meat in both front quarters. The skinned carcass looked like it was involved in a collision with a vehicle.

Interesting. Got any pictures of that?
What do you mean by “dislocate”?

How much damage was done to the far side shoulder? Especially considering you indicated the bullet didn’t pass through the chest? How was there damage done?

Bullet trauma is always interesting to me, and if you shoot enough critters with enough bullets, you’ll see some weird #### happen.
 
I didn’t take pictures of it no. The front leg was ripped out of the shoulder socket and both front shoulders were blood shot. The impact site had 2 ribs turned to dust but the membrane on the interior of the rib cage although blood shot and full of rib dust was intact.
 
Well look at that, Budget has 3 x 500 in stock.
I'm not willing to buy 500 just to try out though. If someone is willing to part with 50 or so to try I'm interested.
 
I didn’t take pictures of it no. The front leg was ripped out of the shoulder socket and both front shoulders were blood shot. The impact site had 2 ribs turned to dust but the membrane on the interior of the rib cage although blood shot and full of rib dust was intact.

Interesting. Don’t know that I have seen an offside shoulder bloodshot before that wasn’t hit by a bullet, but like I said, eventually a person will see some odd stuff when bullets hit meat.
 
I shot 3 deer that year with the 208 A-max, 300wsm. The other 2 were closer so higher velocity. One had a 3” entrance wound and 8” exit. The other, the shot landed high vitals on a small bodied whitetail. The bullet impact sounded like a hammer on plywood. The entrance and exit holes were so large that it ripped through the top of the back.
There’s no question that match bullets kill fast, but meat damage is extreme. I can see the .223 being enough to get quick kills but without the extreme damage. But I would worry a match bullet might explode on the hide and not penetrate at all. If guys are getting good results on medium game though, that does speak for itself.
 
I shot 3 deer that year with the 208 A-max, 300wsm. The other 2 were closer so higher velocity. One had a 3” entrance wound and 8” exit. The other, the shot landed high vitals on a small bodied whitetail. The bullet impact sounded like a hammer on plywood. The entrance and exit holes were so large that it ripped through the top of the back.
There’s no question that match bullets kill fast, but meat damage is extreme. I can see the .223 being enough to get quick kills but without the extreme damage. But I would worry a match bullet might explode on the hide and not penetrate at all. If guys are getting good results on medium game though, that does speak for itself.

The individual bullet makes a difference. The .308” diameter Amax in 208 gr is shorter and has a shorter neck length, so penetration depth being shorter doesn’t surprise me.

The 105 Amax is long for caliber and penetrates deeper. Same as the 88 ELD’m.
Match stuff is definitely dependent on the nose and shank length for penetration.
 
I stood 4’ from a good friend when he put a .243 in a very small Costal Blacktail at a range of 20’ ( that’s feet not yards to be clear) perfect shot right in the vitals . That tiny deer took off like a rocket and it’s only by chance we found it using the old - they head down hill to water rational . I felt a .243 was too small then ,Just because you can doesn’t mean you should .
 
I stood 4’ from a good friend when he put a .243 in a very small Costal Blacktail at a range of 20’ ( that’s feet not yards to be clear) perfect shot right in the vitals . That tiny deer took off like a rocket and it’s only by chance we found it using the old - they head down hill to water rational . I felt a .243 was too small then ,Just because you can doesn’t mean you should .

And what projectile was he using?
A .243 pencilling through the lungs is a whole lot different than grenading inside.

This isn't about the .223, it's about the .223 with the tmk or eldm.
There's a very large difference between a partition for example and a tmk/eldm
 
And what projectile was he using?
A .243 pencilling through the lungs is a whole lot different than grenading inside.

This isn't about the .223, it's about the .223 with the tmk or eldm.
There's a very large difference between a partition for example and a tmk/eldm
And what projectile was he using?
A .243 pencilling through the lungs is a whole lot different than grenading inside.

This isn't about the .223, it's about the .223 with the tmk or eldm.
There's a very large difference between a partition for example and a tmk/eldm

Wait...you're saying bullet selection matters?
 
Back
Top Bottom