358 Winchester

Maybe call it something new and exciting like "350 Legend"!!! Then advertise the heck out of it

And be able to use it in states where bottlenecked cartridges are prohibited, and make it work in an AR, and make it out of the first stage of 223 Rem brass so you can get practice ammo at $18.99 CAN per box and...
 
Last edited:
I always wanted a .358 either in lever or short bolt action rifle but et availability or price keep me out of the game!

But now I see intersurplus has 9,3x57 mm rifles in the $300 range! Same balistics as the 358app. And since you have to reload for both why not go with the cheaper one?
Just thinking out loud! What are you tought on that!
358 or 9,3x57 mm?
 
I'm with you on that, enoch
it seems everyone gets their happy on with a 9.3x57 converted to x64, as though the little guy doesn't have the jam, yet here the 358 is smiled upon
9.3x57 is the cheaper sleeper, CRF and iron sights.....perfect close action thumper
 
I'm with you on that, enoch
it seems everyone gets their happy on with a 9.3x57 converted to x64, as though the little guy doesn't have the jam, yet here the 358 is smiled upon
9.3x57 is the cheaper sleeper, CRF and iron sights.....perfect close action thumper

Except the lever guns are ambidextrous for those of us who are in their right mind…….
 
Except the lever guns are ambidextrous for those of us who are in their right mind…….

One of my good buds hunts a 30-06 BLR for that reason as his "big rifle"....may have to talk him into a stainless 358 so I can borrow it....kiddin, cause its so much better of course
 
The two redheaded step children of bore sizes are .257 and .358. There is hope that new projectile developed for the 25 creedmore will see a increase of interest in .257. Not sure how the .358 makes a return.

There are very few rifles sold above 30 cal. Most would probably be .338. The 35 rem hangs on in levers, but most other 35 cals seem to be semi custom one offs. I doubt you would find a top 100 selling die set in a 35 cal. Even on our EE, it's rare to see brass, dies, or projectile.
 
The two redheaded step children of bore sizes are .257 and .358. There is hope that new projectile developed for the 25 creedmore will see a increase of interest in .257. Not sure how the .358 makes a return.

There are very few rifles sold above 30 cal. Most would probably be .338. The 35 rem hangs on in levers, but most other 35 cals seem to be semi custom one offs. I doubt you would find a top 100 selling die set in a 35 cal. Even on our EE, it's rare to see brass, dies, or projectile.
That's what has me thinking about the 9,3x57mm. 8mm mauser brass or any 30-06 brass , .366 bullets are available easily. Common Powder are effective in that caliber. Dies are available. I dont know how much you can push the power and still be safe in those rifle but it seems to be a good brush gun for big game maybe up to 200 yards or so...
 
That's what has me thinking about the 9,3x57mm. 8mm mauser brass or any 30-06 brass , .366 bullets are available easily. Common Powder are effective in that caliber. Dies are available. I dont know how much you can push the power and still be safe in those rifle but it seems to be a good brush gun for big game maybe up to 200 yards or so...

9.3 x 57 is doable; dies are hard to find and there is no new brass that I have seen. Need to make brass out of 8 x 57 brass or even 7 x 57. 9.3 x 62 has brass available, dies are easy to obtain. Also, you can load a 9.3 x 62 down to 9.3 x 57 performance; but you can't load 9.3 x 57 up to 62 performance.
 
(…)Also, you can load a 9.3 x 62 down to 9.3 x 57 performance; but you can't load 9.3 x 57 up to 62 performance.

Yes you can! Try Leverevolution powder with 285 gr. Bullets in 9.3x57. Easily 2250 fps. That is only 100 fps slower than 9.3x62 hand loads and just as good as some factory ammo.
 
9.3 x 57 is doable; dies are hard to find and there is no new brass that I have seen. Need to make brass out of 8 x 57 brass or even 7 x 57. 9.3 x 62 has brass available, dies are easy to obtain. Also, you can load a 9.3 x 62 down to 9.3 x 57 performance; but you can't load 9.3 x 57 up to 62 performance.

You can make it out of 30-06 easily as well. So brass is simple to acquire. It's a good cartridge. The 9x57 would be closer to the 358 ballistically, but either one would work equally as well on game. I sold my last 358, a BLR a couple years ago, just wasn't using it anymore. But I like the cartridge. - dan
 
.257 and .358. There is hope that new projectile developed for the 25 creedmore will see a increase of interest in .257


This has to be satire...


338 creedmoor has existed for a few years now, 8.6 blackout. 338 copper projectiles twinned with extremely fast twist rates (1:3). Supposedly causes dramatic expansion at low velocities
 
I had 3 but I’m down to 1. Gone are the Ruger No1 and Ruger M77 tang safety. I’m left with a pre 81 Browning BLR, it just seemed to be a more appropriate choice for the type of hunting situation that makes you want to carry a 358. All have been equally accurate with any 200gr bullet, jacketed and cast. For me, it’s the perfect black bear cartridge.
 
I went to see the old gentleman that has the rifle, he has a nephew who is taking the rifle , so I'm not buying it. But now I'm watching the ee for 358 rifles, funny how that works.
 
Last edited:
I always wanted a .358 either in lever or short bolt action rifle but et availability or price keep me out of the game!

But now I see intersurplus has 9,3x57 mm rifles in the $300 range! Same balistics as the 358app. And since you have to reload for both why not go with the cheaper one?
Just thinking out loud! What are you tought on that!
358 or 9,3x57 mm?

I have two 9.3x57 Husqvarna rifles, 1 based on thev96 Mauser and one in an FN98 action. Bullets are commonly available but factory brass can be harder to find. I have some Norma factory 9.3x57 brass but made most of it from 8x57 brass. I use a lot of cast bullets and the 270gr Speer.

9.3x57 is a good cartridge that's very similar to 358 win.
 
If they came up with a 35 Creedmoor and marketing was handled properly it would probably take off.

Branding exercise, 9mm Blackout. Load it up with some 400gr subsonic loads and the Americans would eat it up. And then we get new monster .358 bullets to load into Norma Mags and STAs.
 
Branding exercise, 9mm Blackout. Load it up with some 400gr subsonic loads and the Americans would eat it up. And then we get new monster .358 bullets to load into Norma Mags and STAs.

I'd invest in this scheme lol
 
This has to be satire...


338 creedmoor has existed for a few years now, 8.6 blackout. 338 copper projectiles twinned with extremely fast twist rates (1:3). Supposedly causes dramatic expansion at low velocities

Not satire. Go find ammo, brass, or dies for those. You also have to re read my original post. I was talking about 35 cal, not 338/8.6. Even so, again, very few rifles sold above 30 vs 30 and lower.

I own a 338wm and a 340wea, the Weatherby is difficult to find brass, not 350 mag.difficult, but difficult. There's the 338-06, but can't think of aany other commercial successful caliber in 338.
 
I meant 25 creedmoor, but apparently it does exist. I did read your post thanks, I was just addressing the most outlandish part of it.

The 8.6 blackout is just essentially what Mikeyb described but with a 338 bore so I figured it might be of interest.

Unfortunately the monster bullets are all designed for very low velocities but they seem to be solids exclusively so who knows what would happen if you could stabilize them in a magnum
 
How would you market 358 Creedmoor? What would it supposedly bring to the table?

Much higher BC bullets, throats and rates of twist to fit them well, while fitting in a short action mag?



That makes sense...if a shooter can handle 30-06 they can handle 358 Win

Yup ! loaded up 30-06 has a lot more recoil then a 358 Win . RJ
 
Yup ! loaded up 30-06 has a lot more recoil then a 358 Win . RJ

That would very much depend on the rifle and stock combo. I doubt that in similar rifles with similar weights, stocks and loads (bullet weights) you'd see much difference.

But then on the other hand, maybe the left coasters are more sensitive to recoil.
 
Back
Top Bottom