Mystic Precision
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Summerland, BC
LRC, I agree with you. I don't like high mag when I am rock busting. The larger field of view helps me with watching conditions like moving grass and trees. Plus, I can better spot my own shots.
With plinking, all I want to do is hit the rock. Don't care where and if I miss, I need to spot the dust kick up. I have found 10X to work out past 1000m if the glass is good.
Most of the time I stay in the 12 to 16X range during the summer plinking.
In comp, your shots will be marked so you have immediate feedback. So even if you get bumped off the scope during recoil, doesn't matter.
I am seriously thinking about a variable because when conditions allow, having that extra mag is useful. However, when mirage starts, I prefer to dial down to get a better view of the bouncing target.
There are many that shoot LR with 36X and higher mag. I don't think that will work for me unless mirage is a lot less then where I shoot presently. However, unless I get one and try, how would I ever learn to use it.
Apparently, the best bang for the buck in a 8X32 is the Pentax and Burris 30mm scope. Unfortunately, the Pentax, and I assume Burris BD, have 7.5min per revolution.
Whichever rocket scientist thought that one up should spend a week LR shooting and counting stupid 1/2 min.
I guess for target shooting where you don't need to play with the scope that much, it shouldn't be a problem. Definitely, a lot cheaper then the nightforce and Leupolds.
Fixed 36X would include the Weaver and Sightron scopes. Seem to be popular south of the border.
Will make a better decision after Kamloops.
Jerry
With plinking, all I want to do is hit the rock. Don't care where and if I miss, I need to spot the dust kick up. I have found 10X to work out past 1000m if the glass is good.
Most of the time I stay in the 12 to 16X range during the summer plinking.
In comp, your shots will be marked so you have immediate feedback. So even if you get bumped off the scope during recoil, doesn't matter.
I am seriously thinking about a variable because when conditions allow, having that extra mag is useful. However, when mirage starts, I prefer to dial down to get a better view of the bouncing target.
There are many that shoot LR with 36X and higher mag. I don't think that will work for me unless mirage is a lot less then where I shoot presently. However, unless I get one and try, how would I ever learn to use it.
Apparently, the best bang for the buck in a 8X32 is the Pentax and Burris 30mm scope. Unfortunately, the Pentax, and I assume Burris BD, have 7.5min per revolution.
Whichever rocket scientist thought that one up should spend a week LR shooting and counting stupid 1/2 min.
I guess for target shooting where you don't need to play with the scope that much, it shouldn't be a problem. Definitely, a lot cheaper then the nightforce and Leupolds.
Fixed 36X would include the Weaver and Sightron scopes. Seem to be popular south of the border.
Will make a better decision after Kamloops.
Jerry