6.5 Mystic #2 is All Dressed Up with New Pics.

Yep, the 'debate' stops. I give in and give up. NO more rebuttals, as nothing is likely to be accomplished and it is creating bad blood amoung us.

So back to the rifle and shooting,

Started H4350 and CCI primers testing. Worked up to 46gr and had a pretty good load at 44.5gr (will retest for accuracy and velocity). I have room in the case so will keep going up a bit more. Pressure signs are starting so expect to max out around 47gr. If accuracy returns to the H4831SC levels, I know velocity will be 2950fps or more but brass is going to take a beating. At the location I test, we are on a mound so I can't chrony at the same time I shoot on paper. A royal pain actually.

What I did find was that the H4350 groups stayed pretty consistent through a wider range of powder. No bugholes but no big groups either. All stayed in the 3/8" to 1/2" range at 200yds. Interesting....

With more testing, I want to confirm that this is the case and if the velocity is significantly higher, will give me another tool to approach conditions during a match.

My thinking is this. We never know what conditions we will be facing. You can go from cold in the morning to sweltering by 1pm. Although hodgdon powders are pretty stable, using a powder that has a wider 'sweet spot' reduces the chase of fliers due to temp change. BR loads tend to be very hot so if you get a temp related pressure spike, that shot is going bye bye.

Since we can't load at the range easily, adjusting for conditions isn't plausible.

Also, if the H4350 load goes faster, even if the mechanical accuracy is a bit worse, being able to dodge the wind should improve my practical accuracy (still a novice at reading conditions) and scores. The 1/4 MOA type accuracy is still adequate to shoot possibles.

On calm/consistent days or when temps are steady, the H4831SC load will give me an accuracy edge which will be needed because everyone else will be shooting great scores and you can't drop a point.

Looking forward to see if the above theory will hold water on the range. Downside is that you have to bring ALOT more ammo to the shoot.

For testing, don't get hung up on large volumes of shots per given load. With high ambient temps, barrels heat/movement is going to cause a huge source of error (unless you are going to shoot the rig in the same heat, then test as you will compete or play).

I prefer to shoot low numbers of rds but repeat over a number of days. What I am looking for is consistency and repeatability. I want a load that will do as expected on any given day, not when I am having a great outing. Also, for those days that I am not doing so great, I don't want to discount a good load because I can't hit the broadside of a barn.

For any of the stats people in the audience, I think they will find that 2 to 3 rds over two to three groups per session over 5 or more sessions has as much validity (I believe more) then a several 5rds groups shot on one outing. Given the short lifespan you already have, I want to test over the least number of rds as possible. Best accuracy of any match barrel will be in the first 1000rds. I prefer to use that accuracy during the match or practise.

Besides, to shoot 5 or 10+ shots into a tiny group, as you would in competition, the first two or three better snug right up.

I test the mechanical accuracy of the rifle/load NOT my ability to shoot. I will test on days where wind is as calm as possible. I make sure that I am 'shooting' as consistently as possible so the results are reliable.

Once I have a consistent load, I start practising. Now I shoot under any condition, good or bad, at the distance I will compete in with the number of shots required in my tasks. This lets me know how the load/rifle and barrel hold up under sustained strings of fire and what it takes to drive it successfully.

In F class, that is a min of 17rds with a max of 25rds over 15 to 22min. Sometimes the most accurate load isn't the best load under certain conditions.

That also applies to cleaning. In a match, I may not get the time to clean due to helping out with scoring or whatever. That means my barrel has to keep me in the V ring over the max number of shots fired that day. This barrel is still shooting very well and I haven't cleaned it in 50rds. I will keep shooting for at least another 50rds just to be sure.

If you keep track of how fast your barrel looses accuracy between cleanings, you will also get a good indication of barrel wear. Having to clean with increasing regularity is a sure sign your barrel is nearing the end of its useful life.

Right now, I am delayed simply due to a lack of bullets. I only had the one box of Lapuas and have run out. Why I started testing MK's, etc.

If the bullets show up in time for Kamloops, the next set of testing will be at 300m to simulate the event.

Jerry
 
Jerry - debate? Now that is a laugh.

No bad blood here my friend. People can voice their opinions and thoughts as much as they like. Normally people are a bit more receptive to new ideas and will go that extra mile to prove a point (that is if they are correct of course). In your case, I can understand completely.

As usual, you offer no consideration to proven accuracy norms and dream up just about anything to support your thoughts. I'd say we have a new set of "shooting" standards.....lets call them the MYSTIC ACCURACY STANDARDS for life in MYSTIC land.

It was fun Jerry....
 
### International said:
Jerry - debate? Now that is a laugh.

No bad blood here my friend. People can voice their opinions and thoughts as much as they like. Normally people are a bit more receptive to new ideas and will go that extra mile to prove a point (that is if they are correct of course). In your case, I can understand completely.
When opinions are voiced in a polite manner, most people are receptive to them.
When the person sharing them comes off as a complete ass like you are..people tend to ignore them.

As usual, you offer no consideration to proven accuracy norms and dream up just about anything to support your thoughts. I'd say we have a new set of "shooting" standards.....lets call them the MYSTIC ACCURACY STANDARDS for life in MYSTIC land.

It was fun Jerry....
At least he has the balls to post pics of the rifle he is building and pics of the groups he's shot.
More then you've offered..except for proving how much you love yourself.
 
mysticplayer said:
Right now, I am delayed simply due to a lack of bullets. I only had the one box of Lapuas and have run out. Why I started testing MK's, etc.

If the bullets show up in time for Kamloops, the next set of testing will be at 300m to simulate the event.

Jerry

Hey Jerry, Maybe ### could help ya out with that problem.:p :D :D :D

Sorry sometimes I just can't help myself.:eek::D :D

I'm one twisted individual.:) Am I still invited to Summerland:confused:
 
mysticplayer said:
LRC, I hope you have been in the sauce before that post.

Ummmm, should you still be invited>>>>>>>>???????

Yep. Twisted can be a lot of fun. Hope it works out for you.

Jerry

If Molson Exel with 0.5% alcohol counts then yep I had 2.;) :D It's a work night ya know and on occasion up here we have to leave a little sample of ourselves at work!!;) :confused: :D
 
Long Range Canuck said:
Hey Jerry, Maybe ### could help ya out with that problem.


Hey no problem...no ill will here. I'll get bullets or supplies to almost eveyone..except your .50cal buddy R. down South....

This has been very entertaining to say the least.....

I doubt Jerry has the balls...
 
### International said:
Hey no problem...no ill will here. I'll get bullets or supplies to almost eveyone..except your .50cal buddy R. down South....

This has been very entertaining to say the least.....

I doubt Jerry has the balls...
I don't know why I even got involved in thsi thread. Except it pisses me off when some self rightous a$$hole ####s all over a fellow shooter for posting his opinion on something.
You really are a piece of work.
 
Striker said:
self rightous a$$hole s**ts .
You really are a piece of work.


Striker....thanks for saving me from the typing. But I'll add the "Grow up " part.
 
### International said:
Hey no problem...no ill will here. I'll get bullets or supplies to almost eveyone..except your .50cal buddy R. down South....

This has been very entertaining to say the least.....

I doubt Jerry has the balls...


Changed my post....Hungry is Right.

And with this I'm done. It's already past pointless.:(
 
Last edited:
Come on now folks, let's keep things civil....

This is not the off topic thread and I've known most of you for over a year maybe two....

Let's get back on topic and keep sharing the karma !
 
Wow, that was interesting, this one got really bad. Not sure what made Joe get to this point, he could be a little condesending when it came to threads, but he was great to deal with, oh well, what can one do, sometimes, people are thier own worst enemies.

One thing I would like to add, Joe had bad things to say about mystic's stock, did anyone see the thread Joe started about a custom M70, not that that was an ugly gun, it ois very cool aswell, but it looked no better then mystics gun at the time the negative comment were made, it had an unfinished stock with the huge block, this was a little contradictive on his part seeing that he started that thread, oh well, it is over now.

By the way mystic, I love your rifle, it is very unique.
 
Last edited:
Steve and MikeE, thanks for the kind thoughts.

The rifle is part of an ongoing test to see what can be accomplished using readily available stuff. So far the performance of this rifle has exceeded expectations. Which is great considering that major items are inexpensive or homemade.

Just need to use good stuff where it is truly needed and save money for practise. That good stuff includes the barrel and Ted Gaillard has made me a hummer. Had a nice chat with him and he too was surprised at how well this rifle is shooting considering how little of this rifle and components are considered 'BR'.

At least, he was willing to go 'good for you' and leave things at that. I think he is curious about the Lapua bullets now though. Anyways, another barrel has been ordered and we will see if this project can be repeated in another action. The results of that test will not happen till winter as the barrel is not going to arrive until Oct.

If it does, it will reinforce my thoughts on what makes an accurate rifle. What components matter and how to tune a 'regular' rig for best performance. Will not make the wind any less nasty but at least the rifle will not be the problem.

Got a chance to shoot from a new box of Lapua bullets. Very reassuring when the best load from the last box also drove these bullets into a nice small hole at 200yds. Looks like Lapua has very consistent bullets from lot to lot.

Barrel has now digested 80rds without cleaning. I think it is starting to get 'fouled out'. Test again soon then compare with a cleaned barrel. I hope that it will continue to hold at least 75rds before needing any cleaning. That should get me through an F class day of shooting.

Another test I will do is to see how well loading using a LEE hand press will compare with my bench set up.

Jerry
 
Last edited:
Jerry,

I think it's great, I wish I had as much drive as you to try something like this!

I hope you will be able to shoot the #### off a fly @ 1000 yards, great work.

Steve
 
SUCCESS!!!!!!!

Went out to test at 300m (actually 345yds), Unfortunately, more nasty gusty crosswinds.

However, over the chrony I got some awesome news. The velocity is up where I hoped the design should be.

47.5gr H4831SC lit by a CCI BR2 w/ 139gr Lapua - 5 shot average 2905fps.

48.0gr H4831SC lit by Fed 210M w/ 139gr Lapua - 5 shot average 2950fps.

Both of these loads have shot bugholes at 200yds in dead calm condition.

This matches 6.5-284 performance with less powder and a more 'effecient' case design. 100% load density too. Maybe the Gaillard has broken enough to let things speed up a smidge.

Groups on paper weren't as amazing with 5 shot groups 2 to 2 1/2". Clusters of 3rds 1" or so and the others blown around.

I certainly cannot complain given the wind and mirage. At least, this gives me the confidence to know that it will still shoot possibles in nasty conditions if I can just dope it.

All of the basic design parameters have now been met and the only thing left to do is learn how to shoot it and go have some fun.

Kamloops here I come....

Jerry
 
Finally, got more Lapua bullets to do some final load tweaking. Also figured out why 300m groups were irratic - Loose scope base.

This is now glued and loctited in place.

Out this morning with almost calm air, cool and overcast. First shot was off but the next 7rds went into a nice 1" wide by 1/2" tall group. This was the 47.5gr load and CCI BR2 primers. I think there is a smidge more I can tweak this load.

Kept shooting with 8rds of 48gr and Fed 210M and was not impressed. Despite shooting the same at 200yds, the load fell apart at 300m. I will back off the powder a bit and work up again however, the CCI load seems to be the more consistent.

Two things I found that were hampering my aim was the target/mag of scope, and mirage off the barrel. I can see why so many go to 36X and higher mag. I just don't think they will work well when mirage is high, however this morning, I could certainly have used the higher mag. Maybe a big dollar variable is in my future?

The target at 24X was still slightly obsured by the reticle. I am estimating an aiming error of about 1/4" in both axis. The mirage off the barrel was really throwing shots off. Will have to look at putting a shield on too.

At this point, the rifle is capable to shoot the X ring. Let's see if the driver is up to the task. Kamloops end of the month.

Jerry
 
Last edited:
Good to see you out playing and posting results again Jerry. I have a Nightforce that goes up to 32X on my .50 but I still can't get into using a scope with that much magnification. I have turned it up to try a few times but High mag doesnt work for me past the 24X mark. I hear people praising high mag scopes up but I just can't get comfortable with them. I guess when I hit the Summerland shoot your going to have to show me what Im doing wrong with them. I do love the variable scopes such as the Leupold Mark 4 and the Nightforce NXS, Just recently grown to appreciate nightforce...(leupold is still my favorite but may change with more time behind the Nightforce) maybe the advantage to the 32X is in competition, but for field use I find it to much. Any suggestions?
 
High magnification does take some getting used to, especially when reading and shooting through mirage.
Oftentimes it is better to turn it up, then turn it down a tad to shoot with untill you get used to it.

Cat
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom