MiltonBradly
CGN Regular
- Location
- Hamilton ON
Good work there - neat design, and guaranteed to get the fudds up in arms
Glad to see someone making use of the unlimited mag capacity of bolt guns too!
I was under the impression that enfield barrels generally didn't have enough meat on them to set them that far back. IE - you'd have a gap under the reciever ring where the barrel was smaller than the ID of the reciever ring.
Also, why not make double stack? Just didn't plan at the time? In my opinion they're easier to make than single stack mags in some ways.
My enfield barrel ended up getting cut right around the groove at the end of the threads before the shoulder (cant think of the proper term). The neck and throat are still in approximately the same spot (.303 neck is longer than 7.62x39) as the .303 just a few thou deeper in. As such, there is a short un-threaded section before the new threads start. If I recall correctly I have one less thread on my "new" barrel than the old because of this. My "new" barrel also only bears on the outer shoulder. I was concerned about that for a while until I realized that the AIA guns used a barrel nut (I nearly went with one myself) and one selling point was this "easily adjustable head spacing feature". I gather that a barrel of this type only bears on the shoulder provided by the nut. Special Interest Arms appears to use a full length barrel that bears on both inner and outer shoulders and has the chamber face set back into the barrel to still rely on a stock length enfield bolt head.
Here is what's left of the old barrel... Add to it the .125" width parting tool and the facing cuts made to the remainder and that's how much was chopped... you can see the unthreaded section at the beginning, the new barrel has a slightly longer unthreaded length.
I first made the side plates of the single stack by copying the curve of a stripper clip. When I started figuring out the width (I don't have any other 7.62x39 mags to work off of) to make the mag I considered a double stack but decided to go with a single stack as it was the most likely to work without issue. I didn't want to waste my efforts by building something that was prone to binding up because my curve or width was not correct.
MB




























...























