Quit worrying about that. I don’t have multiple user names. Nor does that have anything to do with this thread. Get over it.
Neither does my 222, the most popular cartridge on the planet.
Quit worrying about that. I don’t have multiple user names. Nor does that have anything to do with this thread. Get over it.
One review so far on the RCC brass…….
https://www.longrangeonly.com/forum/threads/7mm-prc-build.12189/
It was mentioned in the thread that Petersen plans on making 7mm PRC brass. At least a year out.
I wonder if Hornady will be making 7mm PRC brass?
Ok rifle is chambered up in 7mm PRC, just have to pick up and mount the scope and hit the range, loaded up some 175gr Berger Elite Hunters, R26, 215M primers.......
![]()
Why isn’t it based on the full length case? Issue of VLD bullets making the oal too long for a long action? Seems unlikely but I’m wrong all the time
Doesn’t the 7 Rem Mag have greater case capacity?
It does have a greater case capacity but since the PRC is throated for heavy for caliber bullets it doesn’t use it’s case capacity up like the 7RM does when loading heavier bullets, in the end initial testing with the same powder charge and bullet weight the PRC was producing 105 fps faster than the 7RM.
Time for a dose of reality in this thread. The 7 PRC in nothing more the the 280 Rem reimagined. Both cases hold 68 grs of ball powder to the bottom of the case neck, both need a long action. The 7 Rem Mag hold 86 grs of the same powder to the bottom of the neck. Given the same operating pressure, the Rem Mag will 200 fps + faster with any given bullet weight.
Not that it will make any difference, this rifle like all the builds before it will be used to poke a few holes in a piece of paper before being sold off without so much as a CWD ditch donkey to its credit.
Why isn’t it based on the full length case? Issue of VLD bullets making the oal too long for a long action? Seems unlikely but I’m wrong all the time
Time for a dose of reality in this thread. The 7 PRC in nothing more the the 280 Rem reimagined. Both cases hold 68 grs of ball powder to the bottom of the case neck, both need a long action. The 7 Rem Mag hold 86 grs of the same powder to the bottom of the neck. Given the same operating pressure, the Rem Mag will 200 fps + faster with any given bullet weight.
Not that it will make any difference, this rifle like all the builds before it will be used to poke a few holes in a piece of paper before being sold off without so much as a CWD ditch donkey to its credit.
Not that it will make any difference, this rifle like all the builds before it will be used to poke a few holes in a piece of paper before being sold off without so much as a CWD ditch donkey to its credit.
Ok rifle is chambered up in 7mm PRC, just have to pick up and mount the scope and hit the range, loaded up some 175gr Berger Elite Hunters, R26, 215M primers.......
![]()