a good moose gun?

444shooter said:
The great old 30/06 is all you will ever need. Just look at the one of the greatest moose masher of all time in Canada... the .303 British. More moose have been killed with this caliber than any other. And it is inferior to the 30/06 on paper!

Magnums are not really needed anywhere in Canada. Most standard calibers will do the job perfectly well, with less fuss and alot less powder and recoil.

Don't get all caught up with paper ballistics. Dead is dead ;)

A BIG X2!!!

If your brother-in-law wants a new rifle, go for it, however, a moose isn't going to tell the difference between a .30-06 & a .300 Win Mag. If he goes for a magnum, PLEASE insist that he take the time to learn how to shoot it properly...and I'm not talking about taking it to the range the day before opening season, shooting a half box of ammo at 100 yards, getting a 12 inch "pattern" on the target and calling it a day, ready to take to the woods after Mr. Moose!

I've seen too many gut-shot or moose with broken legs that ultimately met with long, painful and needless cruel deaths because of poorly aimed rounds fired by idiots toting the latest sooper-dooper magnum. I'm not saying your brother-in-law is one of these, but there are lots of them on the go and too many of them in the woods each fall!

I'm from Newfoundland, and down here when you talk about a "Moose Gun" its automatically assumed you're talking about a sporterized .303 British Lee-Enfield. There's 30,000+ moose killed in Newfoundland every year. A conservative estimate would say at least 60% of those animals are harvested with some sort of milsurp .303. While I've harvested moose with 7mm Rem Mag, .308 Win, .30-06, .270 Win and .300 Win Mag, I've actually killed the most moose using the .303 Brit. Ballistically, it pales compared to the .30-06 and is a shadow of the .300 Win Mag, however, like any of the standard cartridges, put your bullet where it counts and you'll enjoy hunting success.

Moose really aren't that hard to kill and magnum cartridges aren't required. If you want to use one, you owe it to the animal to become proficient in its use and practice shooting it from actual FIELD conditions and not simply off a bench rest with a sissy bag.
 
If your brother-in-law wants a new rifle, go for it, however, a moose isn't going to tell the difference between a .30-06 & a .300 Win Mag. If he goes for a magnum, PLEASE insist that he take the time to learn how to shoot it properly...and I'm not talking about taking it to the range the day before opening season, shooting a half box of ammo at 100 yards, getting a 12 inch "pattern" on the target and calling it a day, ready to take to the woods after Mr. Moose!

No matter which cartridge he chooses,he will need to learn to shoot it properly.This applies to the 30-06 just as much as the 300 winmag.
 
I've got a 30-06, 300 mag, 7 mm rem. mag. and I've knocked over moose with all of them. I shot the 300 win. mag and the 300 wsm and I like them both. The recoil is nice, just a little more snappy than the 30-06. Buy a 300 wsm or the 300 win. mag. You can't go wrong with the 30 cal.
 
When told the story of how he couldn't imagine he missed... I knew the answer.... his eyes were closed. If you can't shoot it at the range then don't expect to shoot it in the field.
 
So, did we buy the rifle yet?

Cause here comes the moose!


MaMoose-2006.jpg
 
444shooter said:
The great old 30/06 is all you will ever need. Just look at the one of the greatest moose masher of all time in Canada... the .303 British. More moose have been killed with this caliber than any other. And it is inferior to the 30/06 on paper!

Magnums are not really needed anywhere in Canada. Most standard calibers will do the job perfectly well, with less fuss and alot less powder and recoil.

Don't get all caught up with paper ballistics. Dead is dead ;)
True, the 30/06 is all you'll ever need - which doesn't explain why I have three of them when I can only shoot one at a time.

Of course, the old .32 Special is all you'll ever need as well, given the range most moose are shot at. Pete Lum shot one or two moose a year with his rusty old .32 Special until he was a little over 90 years old. You wouldn't have had much luck telling Pete he needed more than a .32 Special... So let's just say Pete has proven that a .32 Special is all we'll ever need.

But wait! A .50 caliber muzzlestuffer is dirt cheap and will drop any moose that ever walked with a round ball if you put the ball in the same place you want to put that 30/06 bullet. So now we can tell people the ubiquitous .50 caliber muzzleloader with the plain old round ball is all they ever need.

Whoa! Hold on... there's archers every year that drop their moose with a bow with a 50 lb draw weight. The floor for "all we'll ever need" is now down to using a bow - no 30/06 or any other kind of rifle required; no PAL, no registration, etc.

What it comes down to, of course, is that whatever is "good enough for the job" is not necessarily what is better, or best, or what fits our hunting style, or gives us some wiggle room if things go Delta Sierra for some reason or other.

I haven't shot nearly as many moose as I have elk, so I can't lay claim to having tipped over dozens of them. But I've shot them with 30/06's and I've shot them with .358 Norma Magnums. They DO tip over faster when whacked by a high speed 250 grainer, even if "dead is dead". I like that - if it means they don't go quite far enough to die in the middle of a half frozen swamp, then I think I win. And bigger rifles are more comforting when you know there are probably grumbly bears snooping around in the area as well.

I mean, if you could see you were about to have bear trouble over a kill and one guy was offering you a 30/06 and the other was offering you a .358 Norma Magnum or similar caliber... which one would YOU take?

Would you say "No thank you, Magnums are not needed in Canada - I'd prefer the 30/06 please..."????

You might; I wouldn't.

Still, if you want more without going the "magnum" route, you can make expansion ratio work for you. The earlier mentioned .35 Whelan will do that for you, but perhaps the .358 Winchester is an even better example.

Depending on the powder, load, etc, somewhere between 57 and 60 grains of powder will get a 180 grain bullet going 2800 fps (or very close to that) in a 30/06.

In the .358 Winchester, 45 grains of several powders will launch a 180 grain bullet at somewhere around 2850 fps. Again, it depends on the rifle, but you're getting about an extra 50 fps (if that's important to you) with. More importantly, you're doing it with a lot less powder...

... meaning, a lot less recoil. Positively mild recoil.

The 300 Winchester will give you another 150 - 200 fps over the .358 of course - it just needs to consume 30 more grains of powder to do it. Teensy bit more recoil...

Of course, you can go with heavier bullets if moose is your game, or perhaps you want to play Dances With Bears In The Alders.

48 - 50 grains of powder will get you around 2575 fps using a 225 grain bullet in the .358.

55 - 56 grains of powder will give you about 2400 fps using a 220 grain bullet in the 30/06. More powder being burned; nearly 200 fps less velocity.

The .300 Winny will outperform the .358 with the heavies, of course. You can get around 2775 fps using a 220 grain bullet and 70 grains of a couple of different powders. The only thing is that extra 200 fps is going to require you to burn an extra 20 grains of powder - about 40% more powder than the .358 would be using, not to mention significantly more recoil.

Incidentally, just for giggles... the .35 Whelan will get around 2700 fps with a 225 grain bullet, and only require about 55 - 60 grains of powder to do it. So... at least 10 grains less powder being burned, only about 75 fps slower, and a slightly heavier bullet.

Once again, all the above are approximate. Results can vary due to individual rifles, powder and charge used, what the rifle likes, etc.

But the bottom line is, you CAN often get significantly improved results by going to a larger bore rifle. Whether that improvement is more speed or same speed with much less recoil, the facts are that expansion ratio is often your friend.

Having said all of that, I'd recommend a nice little .35 caliber rifle for anyone wanting to step up a little bit above the 30/06. Economical. Less recoil. As good or better performance with the mentioned bullet weights over the 30/06.

Or... you could just go and buy a bow...
 
Or you could do what one fellow (nameless, to protect the guilty) did in Manitoba. I work the gunshow circuit with a dealer and Brandon is one of the big shows. Anyhow one year a fellow walks in, says he's recoil sensative, and wants a gun that doesn't kick much for hunting. Now apparently you can shoot deer with a 22 centerfire out there, says that's what he wants it for. ???!!!???
OK, fine, buys a nice gun, out the door he goes.

Next year, guess who comes in, carrying said 223, walking a bit funny, says he needs a bigger gun. Asked him what happened, he said "when I shot the elk, he got mad at me and flipped me into a tree".!!! And yes, I asked him just how far off his proverbial rocker he was. Long story short, the biggest gun he would buy was a 243. Tried to explain a few things, like bullet construction, placement, and when sometimes it's better to have enough gun for the job at hand. Plus there are ways to tame recoil. Will see how he did at next show in Feb. 07.

I guess whatever turns your crank, go with it. Just make damn sure you can do the job quickly, and humanely. Or, failing that, you can outrun your intended prey!
Myself, I went along the lines of Rick's recommendation, on my 3rd 35 Whelen now, with a 4th as a project gun. Sweet!
 
Last edited:
You have elk in Manitoba?
I hear you about this!!
Tried to explain a few things, like bullet construction, placement, and when sometimes it's better to have enough gun for the job at hand.
You have elk in Manitoba?
 
I hail from Sask. myself, but one of my staff owns a farm in Manitoba, and he confirms that there are elk on his property. (Burp! Tasty ones at that!)

I tend to file this one under the "belief in God" category, as there's no other reason for this guy to still be alive. Forget Stephen King novels, truth is stranger than fiction!
 
Moose Gun

Your gun is fine! Just learn how to make the right shot's. Of course, there are always other guns, why else would we have marketing! 300 win's great, 325sm, 338.... but you really dont need them. Put your extra cash in rrsp's and go to the range. Your 06 will kill anything in north america with the correctly placed shot. I know, Ive done it! huntthegame!
 
I have a 9.3x62 for the up to 200yd shots, after that I go back to the truck and get the 338 Lapua if I need to reach out and touch something. I used to use a 7mm rem mag but found that it would damage too much meat at close range.
 
xcaribooer said:
A wise man once said "Development of the smokeless powder rifle cartridge could have ended in 1906 and no hunter today would be handicapped"
Not sure I agree with that!!:confused: :confused:

Maybe he was only talking NA but Afracian hunters like their 375 H&H, 416's and others that came later!:rolleyes:
 
Not sure I agree with that!!

Maybe he was only talking NA but Afracian hunters like their 375 H&H, 416's and others that came later!

Might be true - if the hunting laws had never changed either :) Or society, which has limited the amount of time we can spend in the bush for practical reasons.

Sometimes, when you only have a week or less to hunt, when you're restricted by what you can have in the bush with you, etc etc.... Sometimes you gotta make that 200 yard shot or you're going home empty. And if you only get the chance every few years, that'll hurt.
 
Back
Top Bottom