Slowbalt said:
Stopped watching after 2 minutes... Many of these animals are on the endangered species list, are under fire by already enough poachers, let alone striking rich asswipes. In 50 years from now, our childrens will be seeing this and banging their head on the walls thinking how stupid could we be.
P.S. If your country needs ''paying poachers'' to make money... Maybe you should stop shooting each other in civil wars, guerrilas and whatever else... How about f*cking getting along and working together....
Slowbalt,
you have no idea what you are talking about.
Slowbalt, this is not a discussion about what you believe or are interested regards hunting. It is your right to decide what interests you and then pursue that.
But be very careful not to condemn what others are doing legally and ethically.
If you do not not want to hunt the African elephant then don't. But you are making judgements about something that you obviously know little about.
It is exactly the type of sentiment that you express that is a risk to all hunters. You are the type that hunts with a rifle and then is jealous and raises a stink when a new zone is opened to bow hunting only. Or maybe you are a bow hunter and is pissed off that cross bow hunting is now going to be allowed. Sacre bleu! How can this be!?
Maybe you think only the whitetail should be hunted, or le' original, or the black bear... rabbits and elephants are sacred, etc...
Well get this, without an economic incentive, which safari hunting provides, the elephant, cape buffalo etc, have no future. Those animals represent nothing but obstacles to settling and clearing the land. Hunting gives them a reason to exist. Otherwise they are just a dangerous f**king animal that you would be better to get rid of.
Are you aware that the countries which have banned sport hunting have seen steady and drastic decreases in the numbers of elephant? It is because there is no reason to put up with the bastards. Better to remove them or poach them for their ivory.
Read
Mahoboh, it is available from
www.SafariPress.com. It was written by
Ron Thomson, who spent 20+ years as an elephant control officer in several African countries. He was an ardent proponent of ending the senseless elephant culls and instead controlling the populations by controlled, regulated hunting.
Ron Thomson killed over 1,000 elephants. Entire herds, cows, caves, bulls etc... Does that make any sense to you?
It was done because the elephant were over-grazing their range. Elephant require so much food and water that they can literally turn rain forest into desert, when their population gets too high.
They may be threatened in isolated areas but in others they are so numerous they have to be controlled somehow.
What should the game manager do, that has the responsibilty to administer an elephant herd, that is expanding? Relocate them to another country? How about Quebec? Maybe outside of Montreal? What? Too many people, they would confict! Well it's the same in Africa!
There is no other remote country with sufficient room for these huge animals; it has all been settled by an expanding human population! You can put maybe a handful in a zoo, but not 200 hundred or a thousand. So they are forced to kill the excess animals. Since some must be killed, there is no way around it, why not benefit by allowing hunters to pursue them? Why not?
Do you realize that those
''paying poachers'' are paying upwards of $30,000 to hunt a single elephant bull? That is only the elephant trophy fee. It's the same as any hunting anywhere. Restaurants, hotels, hunting guides, airlines, local natives hired to run the safari camp, everybody gets some of that money.
When a elephant is killed the locals arrive from miles around to haul off the meat. No benefit, eh?
One of the most important game management tools today is the PAC hunt; that is
Problem Animal Control. An elephant(s) goes into a village and destroys the crop of a native farmer, maybe people are killed even. In the old days the natives would kill it or maybe wound it with muzzle loaders, poison arrows etc, or the alternative would be that Game Wardens would pursue it and kill it.
Now many countries take and call in the Game Dept to look at the situation, they classify it as a PAC animal. It has to be killed anyway so they sell the right to kill that animal to a safari company, that has a waiting list of clients that want to kill an elephant.
Once again, this isn't about whether or not you want to kill an elephant, it is about the fact that an elephant has been designated a problem animal that is destroying farms crops and is a threat to kill people if it is not removed, and guess what? No place to remove it to.
If elephant become extinct, it will not be because of regulated safari hunting! Are you aware that Gov't Game Wardens observe all hunting of dangerous game in Africa? Every operation. It is not wanton slaughter, but carefully managed with quotas and target numbers to harvest. It is documented, regulated, blah, blah, blah...
If you take my suggestion and get that book
Mahoboh and read it, then you may begin to understand.
How about have Game Wardens regulate the numbers, determine a sustainable harvest, shoot older animals, derive income that benefits the local community, the Gov't etc...
If you think there is no benefit to the hunt in Africa then you really need to get educated about the modern realities facing game animals in Africa and if you think they are better off in parks, with photo safaris as their existence then you and I sure do not think alike.
I have on order the book
The Hunting Imperative, by
Richard Harland. Another guy that spent years and years shooting excess elephants. He also shoot over 1,000 elephants, it is the story of that experience. Maybe you could buy it when you pick up
Mahoboh.
Until you read and get educated you are just expressing the emotional views that the P.E.T.A.'s of this world spew.
Good day to you.