You have fun with your Norc!
But remember this, why are you posting on this thread anyways then? you don't want to support the Canadian manufactures anyway...
To me, the ony thing we have to complain about is that AR and variants are restricted. I have no problem with the price of Ar's that are avaialable here in Canada.







For a few hundred more you could have a North American made AR or at least buy parts from Canadian manufacture from now on.....
you used a high end boutique rifle part to compare to a norinco..... you can get a colt h-bar in the ee for ~$1100.

And you compared a well USED Rifle to a BRAND NEW Norinco.![]()
to be bought in North America & Europe only!I do know I want to be able to use 10 round mags.
As we know the Glock mags come in 10/33'sfor that tacticool look

Why? Because my dear friends, if you hadn't noticed a rifle isn't a consumable. Our rifles will most likely out live us if we can keep the grabbers at bay.
.
My rifles, like all my tools are consumable. Barrels are only good for so many rounds same with bolts and carriers. Reciever pin holes open up and trigger sears wear. Springs weaken while furniture and rails get smashed on rocks.
You can keep them running forever but you will run out of original parts.
My rifles, like all my tools are consumable. Barrels are only good for so many rounds same with bolts and carriers. Reciever pin holes open up and trigger sears wear. Springs weaken while furniture and rails get smashed on rocks.
You can keep them running forever but you will run out of original parts.
, and I've replaced the blade.....Rivy i see your point! but a used bushmaster with 3 to 4 thousand rds through it will last longer than a norinco ever will!
I know a guy who bought one, great rifle for the money, but he is already replaced so many things on it that were already wearing out.
For me it really comes down to not wanting our small arms being made in China, who are only interested in ruling us one day. Sorry not for me!
to be bought in North America & Europe only!
Some might find the idea of comparing China to Nazi Germany a bit ridiculous, but it’s not entirely unreasonable. Just ignore the whole Nazism/Hitler thing, and look at some of the things today’s China and Germany in the 1930’s have in common:
•Rapid military build-up
•Rising power unsatisfied with its place the current international system
•Authoritarian one-party government that does not subscribe to liberal views of democracy and human rights
•Historical grudges against neighbors and a sense of humiliation about the past
•Very strong nationalism
In fact, some of the same points could also be used to make a comparison between today’s China and Japan in the 1930’s. However, since the author of the editorial is trying to stress the importance of not falling far behind one’s neighbors in military preparedness, the example of Germany and France happens to be a better match. Even if you don’t believe that today’s China is a revisionist power, it still probably makes sense for Japan to beef up its defenses – just in case.
And you compared a well USED Rifle to a BRAND NEW Norinco.![]()
I can think of a few Korean War veterans who would disagree.I'd say, China as a whole, is not an aggressive nation.



























