ricka2 said:sorry i had 6 AD's with my enter key
No wonder you don't feel safe carrying a completely safe pistol (Glock)
ricka2 said:sorry i had 6 AD's with my enter key
Here is a list of some of the U.S agency's that authorize the 1911 for carry.....
Roswell Police Department, New Mexico
Claybuster said:Here is a list of some of the U.S agency's that authorize the 1911 for carry.....
Roswell Police Department, New Mexico
The truth is out there.... :lol:
IM_Lugger said:Bartledan, you're hilarious, have you tried stand up? :roll:
Somehow you forgot to answer the question about why LEO’s stay away from SA guns?
Also how is a STI or Infinity just as advanced as any other gun, yeah it looks modern, cost a fortune, so what? A most modern SA revolver is not any more advanced than one of the first S&W DA revolvers.
How come greater than 70% of Police forces in all of NorthAmerica use Glocks as their duty pistols.Who could they all be wrong?If they were unsafe,dont you think the Police Assosiations would get them taken out of the system and replaced with a better firearm that would be more safe? I think so!
Wow :shock: And these people actually had a say in pistol procurement for 'trained' professionals? I guess some of them missed the lesson on keeping your your finger off the trigger unless you INTEND to squeeze it..They figured a single action pistol was unsafe for carry due to the light trigger pull.I dont agree with this.
No suggestion that Glocks are unsafe... just, that they are NOT more safe. And, from your last post, it would appear that the people making the decisions really don't know much about safety :|If they were unsafe,dont you think the Police Assosiations would get them taken out of the system and replaced with a better firearm that would be more safe? I think so!
Rich McFarlane said:At our Sept. Level II, 2 glocks let their owners down.
One was a KABOOM and the other kept jamming so the owner came in last in his class.
The revolver is great for the guy who is careless and just does his 9-5 shift and goes home.
Please don't tell me untrained simpletons are the reason for getting Glocks.The 9-5 Cop or Armoured car guard does requals once every 6 months.Tell me if that is good practice to give them a pistol that takes alot of skill to use or one that is a point and shoot.You give the simple employees too much credit.
This is my point!!! To me or you this works well.I agree,that we should hire better people.If you ask alot of the people at my work who shoot for sport they will tell you the same.As far as picking on me, you wouldnt be the first or the last!!LOL!!!bluesclues said:[The revolver is great for the guy who is careless and just does his 9-5 shift and goes home.
No such animal. There is no firearm that is GREAT for the careless....
Please don't tell me untrained simpletons are the reason for getting Glocks.The 9-5 Cop or Armoured car guard does requals once every 6 months.Tell me if that is good practice to give them a pistol that takes alot of skill to use or one that is a point and shoot.You give the simple employees too much credit.
Dude, I am not picking on you, but think about what you are saying. Two external safeties and some training can't possibly that difficult :wink: If the department chooses a firearm for any reason (politics, cost) that is one issue. But to state that it takes too much skill to opperate a 1911 leaves me wondering about the people that are being hired
Blue :mrgreen:
:wink:As far as picking on me, you wouldnt be the first or the last!!LOL!!!
One of the main reasons I keep coming backIf I didnt like the debate I wouldnt take part.




























