Asked to provide pictures of lower to RCMP before they will complete transfer?

shawn said:
If you want to bring a lawyer that is up to you, its not court. You're not going to jail, its an administrative hearing. There are only two out comes, the judge orders the CFO to issue the transfer or says they are within their rights to ask for the photos (in this case).

Its you a judge and someone from the CFOs office in a room.

Shawn
Click to expand...

Thanks for this info. I read it understand what it is used for. But concretly, how can someone apply for this?
 
Doesn't work like this...




cr5 said:
Why do you register it with an upper? Mine is just a lower, if they come look then I just put that upper on yesterday. My 9mm is registerd as a complete rifle but once I decide on a new lower for it I'll just own two lowers as far as they're concerned.
They want to screw us at every chance they get so I'll screw back, when they make them prohib and come for them they'll get a couple stripped lowers and the rest of the parts are mine till these idiotic Libtards are down the road and the RCMP are hopefully put back in their place.

Not sure what the OP can do, maybe just take a pic of the lower with a tape measure beside it and sent it in, if they want it stripped then tell them you're not a firearms expert and don't know how to take it apart.
Click to expand...
 
I'd ask them to explain their procedure for easily modifying to full auto and then say that you will give it a try and report back...... :)
 
John Deer said:
I sent them the 6 different pictures of the lower they requested. I am not a firearms expert so I did not strip the lower because I do not know how.

I will let you know how this plays out.
My lower has the thicker sidewalls and from the examples the RCMP sent me it should meet their standards...
Click to expand...

Please keep us informed.
 
SteelCap said:
OP perhaps try and call again. Maybe you will get someone else.
Click to expand...

Exactly... call again, sound confused, ask about your transfer, has it gone through yet? Totally worth a shot and I'm willing to wager it will work.

Isn't it sad this is what the RCMP does with a significant part their time, man power and tax payer $$$? Sad indeed.

Side note, this firearm insurance is starting to look like a must have for us now... insurance companies will be happy.
 
FAQMAT said:
Thanks for this info. I read it understand what it is used for. But concretly, how can someone apply for this?
Click to expand...

Paul T got it below

Paul_T said:
In BC there is a form to take to the Court, must be a similar one for all the Provinces.
http://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/la...-forms/criminal/pcr886.pdf?forcedownload=true
Click to expand...

I have never even got that far, every time something like this has come up they fight for a bout a week and as soon as you mention section 74 they just give up.

Shawn
 
John Deer said:
I sent them the 6 different pictures of the lower they requested. I am not a firearms expert so I did not strip the lower because I do not know how.

I will let you know how this plays out.
My lower has the thicker sidewalls and from the examples the RCMP sent me it should meet their standards...
Click to expand...

I hope you sent them an invoice for professional photography services.
 
This actually started with 12.3 transfers, years ago. It can take years to transfer a 12.3, but they actually make you send it to them to verify. Of course when the 12.3 guys complained, no one said anything because they didn't own 12.3's. We get the overlords we create.
 
the worst is that they are targetting 80% lower that end user have registered. Listen if you have the skill to finish a 80% why would a small wall would stop you ? you allready milled the goddam thing... and sp1 standar ??? you mean the gun that gave us the LL ???
 
My reply would begin with. "Please forward your request for photo's of my lower receiver in writing, I will review your request with my legal council and will consider your request after doing so".

Scott
 
This is one of those questions that I'd almost bet they won't go to court over. All it takes is one person to point out how much work there is to install a DIAS (they do not "Drop In") - never mind mill and drill for a regular FA sear and all of the things that can go wrong with that operation, and they're toast, and they're toast in court, publicly, and on the record. The lab has been pretty much unchallenged in their opinions over the years, and once that dam breaks, and they become fallible and questionable, bad things will happen to their credibility, and to every recommendation they have made and will make, and they can not afford that.

Scott's response would be my recommended path
 
Last edited:
enefgee said:
This is one of those questions that I'd almost bet they won't go to court over. All it takes is one person to point out how much work there is to install a DIAS (they do not "Drop In") - never mind mill and drill for a regular FA sear and all of the things that can go wrong with that operation, and they're toast, and they're toast in court, publicly, and on the record. The lab has been pretty much unchallenged in their opinions over the years, and once that dam breaks, and they become fallible and questionable, bad things will happen to their credibility, and to every recommendation they have made and will make, and they can not afford that.

Scott's response would be my recommended path
Click to expand...

The labs statement is completely full of crap as far as easily convertible. I'd love to see the lab challenged in court, in fact I think it has to happen otherwise they will just keep doing what amounts to harassment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom