I have had an auto on a bc/yt atc since 2006. They have never given me issue.
I do know one fellow here who was refused, but I suspect it was more an issue with him applying for multiple firearms on his atc, which already included a couple large bore revolvers.
My m&p 45, loaded with 10 45 Super rounds, is nine ounces lighter than my 4" 629 loaded with 6 rounds. In a bianchi UM92 style holster it stays clean and dry and I haven't lost it yet.
I stand corrected. Info was what I recall from reading up on the application process which is far from straightforward/standardized. What kind of bullets/velocity are you getting out of that thing as I would have thought 45 acp to be too light of a cartridge for this application?
auto-loaders are deemed "unreliable" under field conditions, carried by a sportsman in either a flap holster or under a covering jacket or coat.
That would explain the millions of pistols carried into combat under appalling conditions by soldiers of all nations since their inception, exposed to the elements.
Not to forget the more open design of most revolvers, subject to dust, mud and crud from innumerable sources; even the slightest bit of foreign matter under the ejector star rendering them inoperable.
Who's kidding who? Any competitor will tell you that handgun reliability depends largely on the quality of the ammo and the skill of the user. Most malfunctions are operator caused.
Flap holster is OK, under a coat will get you tossed in jail. It's an ATC not CCW.
As far as I know it's likely more due to firing and reloading rate as to why the military uses them. Look at the perpetual argument about 1911 reliability and tweaking done to get them to work properly. Either way there are very few autoloaders in calibers I'd deem appropriate for carry in this situation. Judging by above peoples personal opinions vary widely in what is an appropriate caliber as well.




















































