Beowulf mags??? what's the scoop 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
huh, I never moved anything, you obviously have only done selective reading, I have explained what happened to me in detail before on this forum, you are the one not believing me and now you wish to narrow the scope to not include my own case/charges, might as well just narrow the scope to charges related to beowulf mags only since there has only been one case so that supports your argument of a

I guess you just want to argue with yourself

So you say but refuse to post unless I go to your house

I dont want to argue with anyone. I want to show people what the law actually says, not what brian that has everything ever gun related happen to him thinks it is.

Shawn
 
now you wish to narrow the scope to not include my own case/charges, might as well just narrow the scope to charges related to beowulf mags only since there has only been one case so that supports your argument

Brian this thread is about Beo mags. Your legal troubles, I believe you, but I'm guessing that whatever happened to you involved more than a single officer finding a couple of Beo mags in your possession.

We have an example of what happens when someone gets charged with possession of Beo mags. They were confiscated, owner was charged, charges were dropped, owner gets mags back, no legal fees, the end. Your sad tale of significant legal fees, public notices in the paper, reputation ruined, suing for damages, difficulty crossing the US border, and having to eventually move your family to another town to escape the fallout of charges against you that were eventually dropped is hardly typical. It is getting rather silly for you to try and draw comparisons to what happened to you and what would happen when found in possession of Beo mags, especially when we know of how this Beo mag charge concluded.
 
Last edited:
Not being an idiot here, but acting on a clients behalf and contacting the RCMP is more than any consultation has ever included for me.

Why I find it surprising

I'm pretty sure that I know who his counsel was and if I'm right said counsel wants to have a chance to take this to court. Doesn't surprise me in the least that he'd put a few hours in for free.
 
shawn, why are you evening arguing with brian46? countless threads on here that has proven more than once that he is the CGN idiot.

He is bringing you down to his level and kicking your ass with experience.
 
shawn, why are you evening arguing with brian46? countless threads on here that has proven more than once that he is the CGN idiot.

He is bringing you down to his level and kicking your ass with experience.

Unfortunately if junk like that goes unopposed new people believe it and pass it on spreading the cancer.

Shawn
 
Unfortunately if junk like that goes unopposed new people believe it and pass it on spreading the cancer.

Shawn
believe what exactly that is "cancer"? have I said the mags are illegal? no. I have said the RCMP SFSS opinion is clear that they are prohibited devices, they have put it in writing a number of times to various retailer, importers and businesses that considered manufacturing them. Those retailers/businesses/manufacturers have posted up their correspondence with the RCMP SFSS on this very forum so it is no secret. A large shipment of these Magazines was also prohibited entry into canada

I would like to see the matter go to court, I offered money towards the legal fees of the individual that had that opportunity to take it there because of his charges, unfortunately the issue was not pressed by the crown for reasons unknown.

Hopefully he gets documentation that shows why the charges were dropped, It may be very valuable to this issue going forward depending on what it says.

I have not wavered from this position as it has always been what I have posted. Better to have the issue resolved ASAP than just pretend it does not exist and hope nothing ever happens like many on this form push for. Not discussing it on CGN won't make the issue disappear off the RCMP radar
 
The law says they're legal, an organization that neither writes not interprets law has an opinion that they're not legal. That same organization also has released a bulletin that says they are legal.

law: legal
RCMP: both illegal & legal depending on who's opinion you want to listen too.

Therefore: LEGAL
 
The law says they're legal, an organization that neither writes not interprets law has an opinion that they're not legal. That same organization also has released a bulletin that says they are legal.

law: legal
RCMP: both illegal & legal depending on who's opinion you want to listen too.

Therefore: LEGAL
link to said bulletin that specifically states they are legal, (not a non legal or binding interpretation/opinion) of a bulletin

The SFSS opinion letters/documents have all been clear in the way it names all magazines of a certain type.

"Across the spectrum of numerous inspections, RCMP-SFSS has not seen a single 50 Beowulf magazine or a single 458 Socom Calibre magazine for the AR-15 platform that is not prohibited. This is because the magazine designs we have seen have been adapted from the AR-15/M16 5.56 x 45 mm design to accommodate the 458 Socom & 50 Beowulf calibre cartridge but have never lost the 5.56 mm design features.
 
link to said bulletin that specifically states they are legal, (not a non legal or binding interpretation/opinion) of a bulletin

The SFSS opinion letter/documents have all been clear in the way it names all magazines of a certain type.
Brian,
I have a sneaking suspicion that your own personal legal issues are most likely due to not knowing when to keep your trap shut... Just go sit in a corner and be quiet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom