Beretta M92FS or CZ 75B

Which one would you recommend

  • Beretta M92FS

    Votes: 115 44.1%

  • CZ 75B

    Votes: 146 55.9%
  • Total voters
    261
No problem. Just sounded like it. I have been reloading with AIM 124gr and Titegroup and my average OAL is around 1.10.
Click to expand...
I use the same bullets actually. Before I got a CZ I loaded my 9mm ammo to 1.145" it worked in my M&P and P226 (both now gone)
 
I have to agree on the comment regarding the Shadow and Wolf Reloads from Kingston. The OAL is a tad long and add in a mix of different bullets used I had some nasty jams. I have to reseat the bullet abit deeper with the Wolf. My batch were from late 2009 (2000rds) and early 2010 (1000rds)

Having said that I was told that the new batch for 2010 from Wolf have solved the problem with the OAL and jamming issue with the Shadow.

I have Handload some test round with mixed brass and BDX 124 gr bullets and they feed through my Shadow without any problems, then again I re-measured the OAL when reload with different brand bullet used because of the difference in ogive each brand has.
 
Try them both if you can, but my vote is for the 92. I sold off some my other pistols (including a tanfolglio and an 85) after trying a 92, it just fits my hand so much better and shoots to point of aim.

Oh and cbabes your Glock just called something about a cold day in hell before it lets you touch it again?


Eis.jpg
 
BP7 said:
probably because Taurus already does it...
Click to expand...

Taurus 92's are not a 'clone' they are a legally produced Beretta 92 series on original equipment + more advanced mods. (Longer story but I'm sure it has been covered here in spades)

Norinco however would be taking the original now expired patent and producing them en mass w/o any newer patented features.. and even cheaper than Taurus.

Now don't get me wrong.. my original training was on a 93r..,then a 92S (before FS).. but due to the 93r i prefer the frame safly which is in the equiv position to the 93's selector switch.

Add in the lower cost and it's a hands down winner IMO. More $ saved for "food" of the monster :)
 
Just about two weeks. Which is about how long the last restricted took. Should it not take as long as an auto transfer? Computer system check, then update and issue permit. Can you imagine the outcry if people had to wait a month or more to drive their new car?
 
whenindoubtfixit said:
Just about two weeks. Which is about how long the last restricted took. Should it not take as long as an auto transfer? Computer system check, then update and issue permit. Can you imagine the outcry if people had to wait a month or more to drive their new car?
Click to expand...

Indeed... I'd be calling em daily... there is no valid reason at all for a transfer to that longer than a day IMO.
 
whenindoubtfixit said:
Just about two weeks. Which is about how long the last restricted took. Should it not take as long as an auto transfer? Computer system check, then update and issue permit. Can you imagine the outcry if people had to wait a month or more to drive their new car?
Click to expand...

Ed called today he's coming up on week 4 for his AR. Did you want to borrow one of my 92's on Saturday?
 
6gm6 said:
Ed called today he's coming up on week 4 for his AR. Did you want to borrow one of my 92's on Saturday?
Click to expand...

I'd love to know what the criteria is becasuse my M4 took 3-4 days recently when someone else who bought an M4 from the same dealer at the same time took a few weeks. I have a transfer started this morning for a G34 and if it takes 4 weeks like some of the others here I may have to buy a non-restricted in the meantime just to keep my sanity. :p I asked when I called in if there was a backup and she said no. I said I heard it's taking 4-5weeks and she said she was not aware of that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom