The only reason I doubt he said this is it's too articulate for a moron like him. I doubt he could manage to string together coherent sentences like that.
Fake quote. He is still a scum bag though.
10-4
The only reason I doubt he said this is it's too articulate for a moron like him. I doubt he could manage to string together coherent sentences like that.
Fake quote. He is still a scum bag though.
Honestly, we need to ban together and let them hear our voices outside of Parliament Hill! This is ####ing bull####! One clear voice, ccfr and all these other organizations just isn't enough in Canada. Like what? Maybe 3 people from ccfr are supposed to voice our frustration in those meetings? Not a chance! That's not how anything is going to change. We need to make ####ing headlines here! So what? You live in Manitoba, then you take two days off, you fly down there and we show these dip ####s just how pissed we are and let them know "enough is enough" of this bullying law abiding gun owners! I live in Alberta and ill fly down there no problem if we can organize something. Look at the states, and in Canada.... KIDS are banning together to get rid of all guns... Ultimately... And what are we doing? Complaining and signing some online email #### that's not going to get read but deleted in masses by the libtards!
Watch, and remember this, if we don't do something more than what we are already doing, this will get implemented... Just watch.
Times are different than the 70s....we need to let the country know, we are pissed off about always being targets and we won't let this #### continue to happen anymore.
Sorry about my rant.
Call the registrar to transfer non-restricted?!?
Authorization to transfer non-restricted firearms
23 (1) A person may transfer a non-restricted firearm if, at the time of the transfer,
(a) the transferee holds a licence authorizing the transferee to acquire and possess a non-restricted firearm;
(b) the Registrar has, at the transferor’s request, issued a reference number for the transfer and provided it to the transferor; and
(c) the reference number is still valid.
Information — transferee’s licence
(2) The transferee shall provide to the transferor the prescribed information that relates to the transferee’s licence, for the purpose of enabling the transferor to request that the Registrar issue a reference number for the transfer.
Reference number
(3) The Registrar shall issue a reference number if he or she is satisfied that the transferee holds and is still eligible to hold a licence authorizing them to acquire and possess a non-restricted firearm.
Period of validity
(4) A reference number is valid for the prescribed period.
The most concerning part of this bill for me is the circumvention of the Democratic process by handing control of firearm classification back to unelected RCMP officials.
I wonder what CSSA and the NFA pull in annually.... I bet its less thqn 1% of what USA NRA does...
Maybe
https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-1608
Our local conservative Rachel Harder has started a petition against this bill. In 24 Hours it has received nearly 14 000 signatures.
https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-1608
Our local conservative Rachel Harder has started a petition against this bill. In 24 Hours it has received nearly 14 000 signatures.
Also, as a last resort, I heard some ideas about jamming up the backdoor registry by making multiple transfers per day to your spouse/brother/friend and back to you -- if everyone does it, it would grind that to a halt.
And somebody fire whoever the incompetent moron is who keeps holding onto the LGN records after they’ve been told to destroy them.
Seems fitting! Also sue the agency who is holding the records and start a civil suit with compensation. Every other group seems to sue and be successful!
And somebody fire whoever the incompetent moron is who keeps holding onto the LGN records after they’ve been told to destroy them.
You will lose. There is no incompetence, nor defiance. Copies of the registry had been handed out to outside agencies for years under access to information requests, and duly executed injunctions preserved copies of the data and changes to the law retroactively can't change the facts that once the data is created and distributed electronically, especially across a shared network with thousands of users, it is virtually impossible to destroy. The whole conservative witch hunt to destroy the data is just political theater.
There is possibly some argument to made in court about which VERSION of the data to rely on if the government were to try to make any meaningful use of it, but all of those different versions are at least 5 years old.
One thing to be learned here is that compliance with BS makes you subject to more BS.
ya it is typical political BS.. but I wouldn't be expecting a genocide here anytime soon.. Ya gotta lay off the InfoWars bud lol
We need a Donald trump. He atleast gets things done and is being fare with everything I’ve seen so far
Fake quote. He is still a scum bag though.