Black rifle hunting pics needed! VIDEO'S LIVE :-).

[Rivalen]

Porcupine.. And yes, this was expensive...

Outch... I hope he recovered well!!

 

[albayo]

What a shame poor guy.

 

[pvtjohnson]

What ammo were you using?

My CSA VZ 7.62x39

 

[upinsmokeweldinginc]

Pvtjohnson I was using some MFS soft point if I remember correctly

 

[Bareass]

i didn't think 5.56 / 223 would be big enough to take down a moose, or even a deer. what type of ammo are you 5.56 guys using?

 

[Hoplite Tactical Supplies]

Thanks to everyone who contributed photos to this video. What we can use now to get the word out is members liking and sharing it by whatever means they can with either Facebook, YouTube, and whatever other sites you belong to.

We now have the video up, and while it took a little bit and had to be re-filmed it was worth the effort to give the video the justice it requires.

Part 5 of our educational series. In this episode we explore the reason to use semi automatic firearms for hunting.

We also give very recent examples of Senator in the Canadian government that would attempt to define a hunting rifle to a very narrow scope. Also how all three opposition parties (currently Liberal, Green, and NDP) plan to revive or form their own version of a long gun registry.

 

[Boomer686]

Well done video.

 

[lawn gnome]

Define what you can hunt with and then strip away everything that does not fit that category.
That is their plan.

 

[Luis1]

No pics but I have officially made my tavor my gopher gun among other things.

 

[Ravage]

Problem is with these people showing them we kill stuff with our guns just makes them try harder to take our guns away. You can't debate against stupid especially when stupid thinks they are right you might was well spend your time smashing your face into a brick wall.

 

[baker42]

Problem is with these people showing them we kill stuff with our guns just makes them try harder to take our guns away. You can't debate against stupid especially when stupid thinks they are right you might was well spend your time smashing your face into a brick wall.

Unfortunately I feel much the same ^

It almost would be better to not show them, so they think these rifles don't even exist, instead they are going to start googling the names so they know how to spell it on their petitions and posters

 

[zap brannigan]

i didn't think 5.56 / 223 would be big enough to take down a moose, or even a deer. what type of ammo are you 5.56 guys using?

i use .223 for blacktails every year puts them down just fine.

 

[richmyster]

What's the legality of shooting lets say, a gopher, with a restricted, BUT on a range?

 

[mikethebike]

What's the legality of shooting lets say, a gopher, with a restricted, BUT on a range?

i dont see a problem here...

 

[Ravage]

What's the legality of shooting lets say, a gopher, with a restricted, BUT on a range?

Its fine legally I guess, However the gun club will just revoke your range membership and ban you from the range for life. Well 99/100 of them will, I would bet money on that

 

[Otokiak]

Interesting thread and some nice pics of your hunts.

Otokiak
Rankin Inlet, NU
CANADA

 

[richmyster]

Screw it then. My black rifle picture. Used 55 gr varmegeddon. Shot 30 yards with the DBAL.

Shot at my range with permission from the owner (small town range).

 

[Hoplite Tactical Supplies]

Problem is with these people showing them we kill stuff with our guns just makes them try harder to take our guns away. You can't debate against stupid especially when stupid thinks they are right you might was well spend your time smashing your face into a brick wall.

Well the one point I do agree with is you can't debate against stupid.... but otherwise I respectfully disagree.

As said in the vid our supreme court and politicians think the only lawful use of a firearm is hunting and sport shooting. This is why they attack these 'scary' rifles because it attacks half of the debate. Our way to counter this narrative is to show that these rifles can be, and regularly are, used for hunting.

No rifle on the market today, no matter the action, was 'designed' for hunting. The 'hunting' rifles of today are based off of military designs of yesterday (in some cases today for that matter such as the Remington 700 which sees service). This tradition will continue as technology advances, especially with lighter and more ergonomic features of today's modern rifles.

We have to be proactive and counter the argument. We have to control the debate and show that our rifles lawfully do more than punch paper. If a person can post pictures of a Goose hunt with a Rem 870 then they should do the same with a Benelli M2 Waterfowl, or if they can post a picture of a Deer with a Remington 700 they should do the same with a Kel-Tec RFB.

Being quiet and not debating back only serves to lose ground as they can control the narrative. We need to control the narrative or at the very least show that modern semi automatic firearms can be used to feed our families responsibly.

And for those who didn't see it in the OP or don't have your settings to 100 posts per page, here's the vid .

 

[saskcop]

Unfortunately I feel much the same ^

It almost would be better to not show them, so they think these rifles don't even exist, instead they are going to start googling the names so they know how to spell it on their petitions and posters

I hope that you honestly don't believe that if your picture isn't out there that these lieberals with agendas won't believe your guns exist ... Even if there was just a rumour that one existed and no had ever seen it, they would still claim that the rumoured gun was the cause of all the crime and immorality in the entire country.

 

[onetwentyish]

I hope that you honestly don't believe that if your picture isn't out there that these lieberals with agendas won't believe your guns exist ... Even if there was just a rumour that one existed and no had ever seen it, they would still claim that the rumoured gun was the cause of all the crime and immorality in the entire country.

This is true. The HK G11 proved that.