The one dressed like a woman is actually a woman… like a biological one.That’s not cosplay, that’s cross dressing
Can’t beleave I have to specify that these days
Last edited:
The one dressed like a woman is actually a woman… like a biological one.That’s not cosplay, that’s cross dressing
He's just desperate for attention and is personally invested in making this shotgun somehow a negative. Everyone knew what they were getting prior to ordering. The fact is, it's aesthetically and functionally superior to the firearm it is emulating, lol. AND THEN SAYS ITS ILLEGAL!!! LOLTI hasn’t made anyone buy anything. Some people, myself included, are happy to own this clone.
Why do you hate freedom, bro?
Grove, I’m happy for your information and reviews tho.
T.I. claims they are generation 2.
The firearm is severely flawed but it still went up for sale because the 250-500% profit margins on this crap is a higher priority then actually solving the root problems.
Quality doesn't matter as long as it sells out instantly then you have your boost in capital so you can do the same thing over and over again.
Businesses preying on the desperate and acting like they are doing everyone a favor in the process really highlights arrogance and greed.
![]()
I want the market flooded with QUALITY FIREARMS instead of all of this pot metal caveman built bull#### we are expected to be so grateful for while we are in this crappy overall government situation.
If that gets me called a fudd, liberal, polytech supporter/ect oh well I'll wear that badge with pride.
The Crover is the user who went full retard claiming things are illegal so take it up with that idiot.He's just desperate for attention and is personally invested in making this shotgun somehow a negative. Everyone knew what they were getting prior to ordering. The fact is, it's aesthetically and functionally superior to the firearm it is emulating, lol. AND THEN SAYS ITS ILLEGAL!!! LOL
Well it is Tacom and T.I is holding a big venue there like they usually do so im assuming that is taking precedence right now for themAlmost 72h hours since first email. Still no reply from Ti. You would assume that a non working bolt release qualify for that lifetime warranty... but at this point the radio silence make think I aint gonna like the answer if it ever come.
Could be. They also just sold a bunch of micro revolver shotgun.Well it is Tacom and T.I is holding a big venue there like they usually do so im assuming that is taking precedence right now for them
It's been a while since I've seen where the RCMP put the old bulletins to businesses on their website, but the RCMP has, in the past, deemed mag extensions prohibited if the extension will increase the capacity of a semi-auto shotgun. IIRC it was for some Remington guns, and I think also some Benellis.
Edit: went looking, and the only bulletin I can find that's closest to this on web archives is Bulletin 86, which bans the X-RAIL device, as the RCMP considered it not to be 4 separate, linked magazines, but 1 complete magazine, but noted it was prohibited as it can be affixed to semi-auto shotguns. I do recall seeing another notice about mag tube extensions though, but it's not archived there.
For this to get around that, the metal rod would need to be permanently affixed to the cap, and the cap permanently affixed to the tube. As it stands now, since they can be disassembled, that likely means they are insufficient. If the rod can be readily removed and the gun reassembled, then that certainly cannot be considered "permanent." Additionally, as we know from the RCMP's ruling on AR mags, an unpinned mag body is still prohibited, hence why the cap needs to be permanently affixed to the tube.



























