Colt M4??

markl said:
I think you're a bit paranoid, if that we're true they'd be asking more for the m305's which would still sell at hundreds more than they're selling for now. Same as the Russian sks and many other firearms. It's hard to gouge these days when the online dealers keep the pressure on by offering low prices.


And stay in the restricted class.
Click to expand...

You really think these things are going to be non restricted ???
LOL
 
tavor is 223 and non-restricted

so why not a colt ar15 22 lr ....

personally i'd buy the ruger 10/22 first and of course ...

if you are going there a tavor. much better bang for lotsa bucks tho'

People who see life as anything more than pure entertainment are missing the point. - George Carlin
 
#1bcshooter said:
You really think these things are going to be non restricted ???
LOL
Click to expand...


It has a completely different receiver from a standard AR (from all reports). What about the AR-180 which is prohib and an AR-180B is non-restricted explain that? They are the same caliber and have completely interchangeable uppers. I believe it is COMPLETELY within the relm of possibility that they will be non-restricted.

Yes....yes....GSG5 prohib blah blah...........
 
Last edited:
#1bcshooter said:
You really think these things are going to be non restricted ???
LOL
Click to expand...

You're assuming a lot... namely that it operates the same way a .22LR upper for a standard AR15 does.

We've been told the FRT issued for the rifles makes them non-restricted. Until informed otherwise by all of the dealers, I think your mockery is a little premature.
 
Even if they are restricted, who the f*ck cares?

If you live in an urban area like most people do, odds are you can't discharge any firearms within city limits save for specific areas like shooting ranges, so what the f*ck difference does it make in a situation like that if it's restricted or non-restricted?

Also, you're getting a full AR in rimfire caliber for half the cost of a similarly built AR from a dealer like Questar, assuming a Rock River Arms lower and TS .22 upper. Are you telling me you'd rather pay twice the price for a rifle that will perform exactly the same way?

I swear, people complain for the sake of complaining... and yes, I'm fully aware that it applies to me as well.



The bottom line is, you're getting a rimfire AR15 in carbine configuration, possibly non-restricted due to different internals and incompatibilities with standard ARs, ready-made for any optics of your choice, for less than 800$. Again, what is there to complain or laugh about? Please, somebody learn me a book.

270915355_c8b9ae48e6.jpg
 
Last edited:
Soli said:
You're assuming a lot... namely that it operates the same way a .22LR upper for a standard AR15 does.

We've been told the FRT issued for the rifles makes them non-restricted. Until informed otherwise by all of the dealers, I think your mockery is a little premature.
Click to expand...

There are some pretty cheesy 22 AR copies out there that have nothing in common with a AR15 except looks & name & they are classified restricted so how dose this one differ . We have been told lots of things from dealers . I will believe it when I see it . Don't get me wrong I hope this one gets through .
Not that I would pay that much just to run around in the bush with a cool looking 22 . I'll take my AR180B in the bush & my AR15 & M4 to the range when I want too
 
Soli said:
We've been told the FRT issued for the rifles makes them non-restricted.
Click to expand...

Unless I've missed it, I haven't seen any statements that the FRT is issued. I've done a search and I have not found the FRT. When it gets an FRT then we'll know it's classification. Until then it's hearsay and conjecture.
 
Kodiak Outpost said:
Unless I've missed it, I haven't seen any statements that the FRT is issued. I've done a search and I have not found the FRT. When it gets an FRT then we'll know it's classification. Until then it's hearsay and conjecture.
Click to expand...

.22lr "Colt M4" type rifle
Thursday, February 26, 2009

We have been advised that these will be arriving in June, non-restricted, price to be confirmed. Watch this space for more details.
Click to expand...

With Wolverine posting statements like this it gives me a bit more faith it'll make it through, but i guess time will tell.
 
Soli said:
If you live in an urban area like most people do, odds are you can't discharge any firearms within city limits save for specific areas like shooting ranges, so what the f*ck difference does it make in a situation like that if it's restricted or non-restricted?
Click to expand...

Then there are the lucky few who NEED to use a gun. As in my situation. To keep the rodent level down, protect the cattle, ect. Sure i could just go out and buy a ruger 10/22 and use it. But heck, if this thing is non restricted. Why not eh?
 
Farmb0y said:
Then there are the lucky few who NEED to use a gun. As in my situation. To keep the rodent level down, protect the cattle, ect. Sure i could just go out and buy a ruger 10/22 and use it. But heck, if this thing is non restricted. Why not eh?
Click to expand...

Agreed. :)
 
Farmb0y said:
Then there are the lucky few who NEED to use a gun. As in my situation. To keep the rodent level down, protect the cattle, ect. Sure i could just go out and buy a ruger 10/22 and use it. But heck, if this thing is non restricted. Why not eh?
Click to expand...


Riding a horse around the farm with one of these strapped to your back, plinking gophers and what have you, would be awesome.:cool: I may have to buy a farm just to be able to do that.:rockOn:
 
Well, this might seem bad. But i never got taught much about "silencers/sound suppressors/flash hiders", but what are the regulations for having one on a .22lr? Does it require a prohibited license?

Thanks

Edit:

Oops thread jacking.... sorry, back on topic. I can't wait for these to come out. And for mounting sights and glass, would it need a raised beaver tail?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom