I have gathered that M305 is very decent rifle, but somehow falling a little short in quality control issue. People in this forum have commented that, when in comparison to M1A, M305's quality is inconsistent between shipments.
My question is, are the shortcomings of M305 something well known? I mean, are there specific areas of deficiency that I can correct after acquiring the rifle, before the problem become apparent, or even troublesome. If one could identify these shortcoming even before using it, and correct them, then wouldn't M305's quality be on par with M1A?
Of course, not knowing how much it would cost to fix the problems, I don't know how cost effective it would be.
One more thing is, between FORGED receiver of M305 and that of M1A's receiver (cast? right?), what is the biggest concern? One is absolutely superior to the other? More dangerous? Longevity issue?
My question is, are the shortcomings of M305 something well known? I mean, are there specific areas of deficiency that I can correct after acquiring the rifle, before the problem become apparent, or even troublesome. If one could identify these shortcoming even before using it, and correct them, then wouldn't M305's quality be on par with M1A?
Of course, not knowing how much it would cost to fix the problems, I don't know how cost effective it would be.
One more thing is, between FORGED receiver of M305 and that of M1A's receiver (cast? right?), what is the biggest concern? One is absolutely superior to the other? More dangerous? Longevity issue?