
I have a modest collection of handguns, spanning 1903 to current items. They all get used. It saddens me to think of my Grandfather's Colt Woodsman or 1911 being taken from me if things continue toward bans and "buy back".
My question is- how many of us are continuing purchase handguns? I see items on my lgs websites moving still, but I hesitate to invest any more of my money into restricted (ie traceable) firearms.
Where are you all at on this? Do we really expect a fair dollar from Bill Blair on a 1st gen Colt SAA? I think not.
I mean we have all seen the liberal announcements ...
Liberals announced assault weapons ban ... assault weapons ban happened
Liberals announced hand gun ban .... guess what will happen ...
The best case for the next election is another liberal minority government which means: bans
You can also tell that the liberals are getting smarter ... its no longer an assault weapons buyback that costs billions .. no, they are making owning your paper weights (monitored alarm and police visits) so expensive and difficult that many people will happily hand their guns in
Also giving the handgun ban to the cities is another brilliant move that will let them ban hand guns at zero cost because they are not taking them... you will get the free choice to give up your guns or move to some small town that didn't ban guns ...
I haven't rented traceable firearms from the government in a few years, as I saw which way the wind was blowing. BUT I support your right to buy as many as you're comfortable with. I'd definitely buy handguns if they were treated same as any other tool as I enjoyed shooting them.
I buy what I want when I want.
As far a bans; buy backs yada, yada, yada will cross that bridge when/if it happens.
---------
NAA.



























