I think you missed my point entirely. I was simply trying to point out that they are different rifles for different purposes, an apples to oranges comparison, different rifles and different markets.
I generalized the answer, however it appears a more detailed explanation is warranted.
The tavor is comparable to the mdr, price and market so that comparison I get. You cherry picked my last response to make your own point. If you want to compare PGW and the DTA srs the coyote is not a fair comparison. An excellent rifle but not the same. The srs platform are all able the be configured in .338 so a more accurate comparison would be the timberwolf which is not $4800. Let's round down and put at the $6800 that you can get an srs brand new for. (At Epps right now) that would be a better comparison and adds up to the same price difference.
A better comparison would be the ai which has pretty much the same features that the srs has. Last I checked they carry a price of $7500 plus, or 2.5x the price.
Let's make it even closer and compare a company that has similar products, FN. The scar has a comparable price to the tavor and MDR based on a quick Google search. FN also makes a multi caliber precision rifle the ballista, which has price of $7500 American, making it worth over 2.5x the price of the scar 16/17
My comment on Sako vs. Savage was more a point to show how the markets for both are different.
If you want to compare atleast compare apples to apples.
I do agree that csc had a good explanation, as I did read their post.
Thanks for your attempt to explain, at least you tried. Shooting Center already provided a much better explanation in post #34 that made sense.
Using your examples a coyote is $4.8k vs Tavor at $3k, 1.6x price vs 2.26x for SRS/MDR; a 40% diff.
Obvious why Sako cost more than Savage due to quality difference. For sure DT will tell you there is NOT the same quality difference between the SRS and MDR.
Go read Shooting Center's explanation, they nailed it.