Actually, your response is kind of why I would lean more towards no than I would yes.
Wow.
With that amount of logic, you're gonna go far in life.
NOT.
Actually, your response is kind of why I would lean more towards no than I would yes.
I agree, I rather see it fall under the current system(restricted/non-restricted). And that needs to be overhauled or preferably eliminated.Frankly, I wouldn't want a FA gun, nor should ANY Canadian gun owner want a FA gun if all it leads to is more red-tape and more layers of bureaucracy. Once the government gets involved, it is near impossible to get them back out after you figured out you've made a mistake and asked for the wrong thing in the wrong way.
Are you baiting me?
Why not offer more choices instead of creating a poll fitting for the newspapers of Toronto? Because except for the hints that YOU as a firearm owner are not to be trusted, I don't have a problem with YOU having full auto. You have an RPAL, don't you? Doesn't that mean that you have passed all the criteria to own a firearm? Why would I want to impose some further caveats on you?
Are you implying that maybe you are not as sane and responsible as you claim to be? We await your response.![]()
Full auto would require a greater degree of training to operate? In what way? You know where your suggestion leads to, right? And why it's a horrible idea?
What you're talking about is a "graduated" firearms licensing program, of course run by the government, to the detriment of all gun owners.
Frankly, I wouldn't want a FA gun, nor should ANY Canadian gun owner want a FA gun if all it leads to is more red-tape and more layers of bureaucracy. Once the government gets involved, it is near impossible to get them back out after you figured out you've made a mistake and asked for the wrong thing in the wrong way.
EVERYBODY WHO VOTED YES GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS.
Sure I would love to own full auto but if you stopped for one second to think what it would be like you would realize it is not realistic. Can you imagine all the hill-billy fudds they already have at the ranges shooting like retards with their sks's? Now add full auto the mix and people will be getting killed very fast. Not to mention getting the CFO to certify a range for full auto use would be next to impossible.
Keep living in your fantasy world guys.
Woo! This thread has entered a new level of internets awesome!
To avoid people inadvertently killing each other. These are usually the same "slide fire stock" people that seem to perk up Thursdays...
DUDE! You're a good guy and I like your posts, but you are waaaayyyyy off base here.
I think they should be imported, sold and owned without much in the way of restrictions.
I never get the concept of owning a full auto firearm?
First...you can't target shot with full auto...you wont hit ****.
Second...you will be broke from all the ammo cost.
the whole 20k plus thing is an anomaly, if new production guns were allowed, we could have FA norincos for like a grand like they do in the Philippines... which is how it should be, all we really need to do is make a prohib pal attainable as a new issue license, and we dont have to worry about pre ban like the yanks
Only if it's legal.
Because I'm inherently lazy?Seriously, I just wanted to keep it simple(r). The hints that I'm not to be trusted; not entirely sure I follow? I'm probably fine with having full auto, although to be perfectly honest it's not one of those "holy firearm grails" for me. I imagine it would be fun a few times for sh*ts and giggles, but then the inherently cheap bastard in me would start calculating ammunition costs and it would be all downhill from there...



























