Gothmog said:The issue of daycarders is an interesting one.
The perception is that daycarders cause much of the vandalism of target stands and general destruction on (unsupervised) ranges. We now quite possibly have an example of a daycarder's poor attitude to the rest of the shooting fraternity ... a lack of solidarity to say the least!
Should clubs end the practice of allowing daycards except when as a guest of a member? Does the selling of daycards allow some people the luxury of thinking that they need make no commitment to the shooting sports in general because, quite frankly, they have nothing invested in it.
Just a thought ... I've heard it batted about at times, but more for the reason of defending club facilities than anything else.
its just not as simple as that.i am a member of poco,but go shooting as a quest at squamish quite often.squamish has a thing about locals only as members so i'm stuck being a quest for the time being.would i like to go as a drop in?sure,but not being a member or quest of a member just doesn't cut it if no one else is there to open the gate.my mother- inlaw lives in gibsons,so again i go to schechelt as a drop-in.i just don't go there often enough to get a membership.thats three ranges i go to already nevermind when i was shooting trap ,i would go to another range in poco area,i just can't remember its name right now.
drop-in is a great concept,lets not ruin it because of a very small percentage of ash@@ts.
just like firearm owners across this country don't want to be villanized because of some mentally disturbed piece of dirts actions.




















































