The Lee-Enfield clause is an exemption to the stupid mag capacity law. It was done to placate native hunters and nothing else. ...
I'm not a big game hunter, so IDK-- is it even legal to hunt with a ten round mag? Only if it's an Enfield?
The Lee-Enfield clause is an exemption to the stupid mag capacity law. It was done to placate native hunters and nothing else. It has nothing whatever to do with New Zealander (Only 1500 Charlton's made) LMG's or any other conversion you'll never see.
An AIA mag runs $69.95 when Marstar has 'em. Kind of a pricey way to get around a stupid law.
Manual-actioned firearms (bolt, pump, lever etc.) have no maximum magazine capacity EVER.
I know you're thinking about rifles, but manual action (e.g. pump) shotguns DO have magazine restrictions for hunting when using shot.
Those restrictions exist under provincial law. We are discussing magazine restrictions under the federal firearms act. Manual shotguns and rifles have no magazine limits under the federal firearms act.
True enough, but some of the posts might be misleading to folks who don't know the issues in the provincial hunting regs - someone said they have "no mag restrictions, ever", for example. You and I know what he means, but someone new to firearms and hunting could get into trouble if they took that at face value.
Sunray is completely and 100% wrong as usual. For hunting, the magazine capacity is defined by the provincial hunting regs, and if not defined there, it reverts to the Federal laws. Manual-actioned firearms (bolt, pump, lever etc.) have no maximum magazine capacity EVER. Likewise, rimfire long-arms have no maximum capacity either.
The Lee-Enfield clause is an exemption to the stupid mag capacity law. It was done to placate native hunters and nothing else. It has nothing whatever to do with New Zealander (Only 1500 Charlton's made) LMG's or any other conversion you'll never see.
An AIA mag runs $69.95 when Marstar has 'em. Kind of a pricey way to get around a stupid law.
I believe the AIA magazines NRM are taking preorders for are going to be pinned to ten rounds, eg, 10/20.
As it is a .308 based on an AIA mag well, different than an old Lee Enfield magazine, I wonder if that pin is really needed.
The Lee Enfield clause in the act is confusing. Is it just an exception for any Enfield magazines that might otherwise be prohibited? Are all Enfield mags otherwise prohibited, including 308 win mags?
Why do people keep perpetuating this myth? NR Magazine has never said this is the case and I cannot understand why anyone would think it is. They are 10 , 20 and 25 round magazines designed for use in a bolt-action rifle. What part of that is so difficult for people to understand?
Because the law specifies magazines designed for an enfield need to be pinned to 10. I'd appreciate it if someone can clear this up and why the AIA isn't considered an enfield. Just for curiosity, not as a complaint.
I ordered mine. $75 is a fair investment to what could be the beginning of 'see, you gave us some responsibility and we didn't blow our deeks off with it', in regards to the whole mag cap thing. Like a bunch of tiny loop holes opening up so eventually we don't have magazine limits on anything.
And if they do become prohib, it's not like they're registered so it could be just as easy as burying it in the backyard and forgetting you owned it. There's worse ways to spend $75.
Why do people keep perpetuating this myth? NR Magazine has never said this is the case and I cannot understand why anyone would think it is. They are 10 , 20 and 25 round magazines designed for use in a bolt-action rifle. What part of that is so difficult for people to understand?
This is a game changer. I predict the m305 will rapidly become the most popular center fire semi-automatic rifle in Canada, if it is not already.
I have pre-ordered four 20 round mags and already I regret that I did not put in a larger order. I currently have three 10 round AIA mags and they work great, I am really looking forward to this!
Why do people keep perpetuating this myth?