F U RCMP Criminal Operations Branch

did anyone notice this

Broadcast. was sent to E members and not to the general public?

so there may be a defence to the charge as even the local police just say

use a 10 round and u have no problems and will not answer other questions in writing or verbally to tie their collective hands to a position

Jeff
 
Blastattack said:
They picked 10 because it’s a nice logical number. Most target disciplines operate in multiples of ten, ten rounds, plus a spring and follower is about the right length of a standard grip frame. Ten subdivides evenly into the standard box of 50 rounds. There isn’t any real reason why a .22 pistol should or would have more or less rounds. Having said that, keltec made a 30+ round double stack pistol in Rimfire.
Click to expand...

Everything anyone needs to know about this has already been posted in this thread. I suggest you read a couple posts back and read the actual law for yourself. If you choose to actually believe what you posted then so be it. Ignorance is bliss.
 
Blastattack said:
They picked 10 because it’s a nice logical number. Most target disciplines operate in multiples of ten, ten rounds, plus a spring and follower is about the right length of a standard grip frame. Ten subdivides evenly into the standard box of 50 rounds. There isn’t any real reason why a .22 pistol should or would have more or less rounds. Having said that, keltec made a 30+ round double stack pistol in Rimfire.
Click to expand...

And in Canada that keltec has to be pinned at 10rds...
 
It's coming together. I ordered a Primary Arms 1-6X with the .22LR ACSS reticle and some low 30mm rings. I may have to go to a cantilever mount if the rings don't work.

As for the stock I tried to order a Magpul X22 from Wolverine but their website wouldn't complete the transaction.

I think it's going to turn out to be a great little do it all .22 carbine and before I forget,

F U RCMP Criminal Operation Branch.

Canada is not a police state and the police should enforce the laws and not make them up.
 
Cameron SS said:
....

As much as we like to hate on the RCMP for their terrible interpretations of the law, terribly written laws can only possibly result in terrible interpretations.
Click to expand...


Except that neglects the fact that the RCMP has - on numerous occassions - revised & contradicted its previous pronouncements/interpretations.... :wave:


The RCMP ought to be able to express a consistent and unchanging position on a give matter (upon which peple should be able to either rely and/or be given compensation), but it seems as though that is too much to ask... :canadaFlag:
 
Instead of spending thousands of man hours going after magazines never used in a crime and that have been owned by Canadians for over 30 years, maybe these RCMP officers could you know, go after criminals?

4400 Canadians die each year because of fentanyl dealers. Maybe start there you fat fcuks?
 
Last edited:
I understand how you are feeling but i would suggest it is time to go out for a walk and clear your head.
 
GreenBob said:
I understand how you are feeling but i would suggest it is time to go out for a walk and clear your head.
Click to expand...

How can anyone justify the actions of the RCMP Criminal Branch prohibition of rimfire magazines, thousands of which have been peacefully and legally owned by Canadians for decades?

Their actions render us vulnerable to criminal charges for possessing legal magazines that we have owned for decades.

This has destroyed my trust in them as their actions are clearly political.

Only police states allow their police forces to make law.
 
Please note my comments are directed to the Criminal Branch personnel and their politically influenced masters, not the RCMP members who police some of our provinces and cities.

It is the misuse of the former who are used to persecute law abiding firearms owners that I object to. Especially when there is no shortage of criminals like the fentanyl importers and sellers who need to be caught and punished for their real crimes as opposed to the paper crimes that we are being threatened with.
 
Very much concur, they're just being #######s, maybe in response to our unwillingness to submit during the Harper years.
Screw em.
 
Blastattack said:
They picked 10 because it’s a nice logical number. Most target disciplines operate in multiples of ten, ten rounds, plus a spring and follower is about the right length of a standard grip frame. Ten subdivides evenly into the standard box of 50 rounds. There isn’t any real reason why a .22 pistol should or would have more or less rounds. Having said that, keltec made a 30+ round double stack pistol in Rimfire.
Click to expand...

Yes, and the Keltec PMR-30 magazines must be pinned to hold a maximum of 10 rounds to be legal in Canada.
 
ldCKk53l.jpg
 
RangerPark said:
10 round magazine limit for a rimfire handgun is not opinion, it's law. Would you like me to quote it for you or can you master the Google fu?

Ok this one is hard. Here's a hint:

Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and Other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunition and Projectiles as Prohibited, Restricted or Non-Restricted

SOR/98-462

Part 4, Section 3(1)(b) and 3(2)(a)(i).

3(1)(b) sets magazine limits to 10 rounds for all handguns. Section 3(2)(a)(i) sets a limit exemption for rimfire rifiles only, not handguns. You might need to read it more than one time.

This isn't about the BX25 magazines, clearly there was interpretation there. As for 10 round limits for rimfire handguns, no interpretation there, that's law, a very confusing and asinine law at that.
Click to expand...


Hey Ranger Park

Hold on to your sanctimonious b.s. ramblings and google this ffs:p

https://store.prophetriver.com/uber...se-hardened-frame-blued-5-5barrel-mfg-356187/
 
RangerPark said:
The restriction is for magazines. Revolvers don't have magazines. Do you need to Google that to make sure?
Click to expand...

Oh hush we still love you:bigHug: On another note, if the liberals go away in the fall will the whole 10/22 hi cap mags get looked at again or will it be status quo on the regs?
 
johnl said:
Oh hush we still love you:bigHug: On another note, if the liberals go away in the fall will the whole 10/22 hi cap mags get looked at again or will it be status quo on the regs?
Click to expand...

I realize your first comment was tongue in cheek, I apologize for the harshness. As for magazine capacity laws, I think we're stuck with them for the foreseeable future. Conservatives lobby for firearm owners votes but they're far from being pro gun. Some bad firearms was done under Conservative governments. They shouldn't make things worse but I don't see them reversing anything major. Magazine capacity laws are utterly useless and and convoluted. Would a Conservative government have the balls to reverse them? I don't think so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom