blaxsun
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
You could always look at an ACR and get a 300 Blackout barrel for it?
FN SCAR-16s: RIP Oct 2012
- Thread starter blaxsun
- Start date
You could always look at an ACR and get a 300 Blackout barrel for it?
blaxsun
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Non-phixion
CGN frequent flyer
Don't forget your PS90 with armour-piercing ammunition.
Hahaha, I would snap one up in a heart beat if we could run the mag with 50 rounds, the ammo cost is kind of a down fall as well. Did someone say B&T MP9?
Well not that it matters to any decision now but I wonder if this was based off of a converted auto or the full auto military SCAR??
I did see the thread that chas2wnb made on his importation and findings and where Questar weighed in, but was it clear if it was a true military full auto or a CA?
Again not that it matters but pure curiousity I guess...
I did see the thread that chas2wnb made on his importation and findings and where Questar weighed in, but was it clear if it was a true military full auto or a CA?
Again not that it matters but pure curiousity I guess...
blaxsun
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
I believe they were the FA versions.
Could everyone please stop comparing the SCAR to other rifles saying "if they let us have this why can't we have that?"
Do you know what you are doing? You are throwing all the others under the bus hoping some SH*T for brains in the classifications department realizes he is stupid. What will be more likely to happen is that person will add those rifles you just pointed at to a list to be looked at again and we may lose more rifles to this stupidity.
You are all right of course and the comparisons are justified but expecting someone in goverment to realize they made a mistake and that the way they do things is wrong and then go back and undo their error is not going to happen.
The classifications and firearms laws in Canada are nothing short of retarded. There is no comon sense at all and no consistancy either. We are forced to accept their decisions and work with and around them to the best of our ability (if we can interpret the rules without needing a lawyer to explain them to us).
Don't worry though, the world ends in a couple more months then we can do whatever we want with our rifles and pistols
Do you know what you are doing? You are throwing all the others under the bus hoping some SH*T for brains in the classifications department realizes he is stupid. What will be more likely to happen is that person will add those rifles you just pointed at to a list to be looked at again and we may lose more rifles to this stupidity.
You are all right of course and the comparisons are justified but expecting someone in goverment to realize they made a mistake and that the way they do things is wrong and then go back and undo their error is not going to happen.
The classifications and firearms laws in Canada are nothing short of retarded. There is no comon sense at all and no consistancy either. We are forced to accept their decisions and work with and around them to the best of our ability (if we can interpret the rules without needing a lawyer to explain them to us).
Don't worry though, the world ends in a couple more months then we can do whatever we want with our rifles and pistols
TV-PressPass
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Mountains, Alberta
Sooooo . . . .
What's the next cool gun we set all our hopes on?
What's the next cool gun we set all our hopes on?
WestIslandRifle
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- QUEBEKISTAN, Canada
I swear thay have a triangle shaped coin marked prohibited, restricted and non restricted on every desk at the rcmp lab
I am inclined to agree with this statement..Could everyone please stop comparing the SCAR to other rifles saying "if they let us have this why can't we have that?"
Do you know what you are doing? You are throwing all the others under the bus hoping some SH*T for brains in the classifications department realizes he is stupid. What will be more likely to happen is that person will add those rifles you just pointed at to a list to be looked at again and we may lose more rifles to this stupidity.
You are all right of course and the comparisons are justified but expecting someone in goverment to realize they made a mistake and that the way they do things is wrong and then go back and undo their error is not going to happen.
The classifications and firearms laws in Canada are nothing short of retarded. There is no comon sense at all and no consistancy either. We are forced to accept their decisions and work with and around them to the best of our ability (if we can interpret the rules without needing a lawyer to explain them to us).
Don't worry though, the world ends in a couple more months then we can do whatever we want with our rifles and pistols
Considering I'm in the SCAR 16/17 thread rather than the Norinco @ 26, I'd say I'm doing ok for myself, but thanks for the concern.
- Location
- Western Canada
I'm thinking that, with how 'full retard' the Firearm Centre is: We just have to wait for Norinco to start making SCAR-16s/-17s ripoffs, and they'll be unrestricted, in Canada, in no-time!
