Non compliance enough of this BS already.
It isn't even happening.
Chasseur said:In the Nova Scotia yearly hunting pamphlet there has been for the last few years a warning on the effects of human consumption of game animals shot with lead bullets.According to the information when an animal is shot with a high powered cartridge lead particles are distributed throughout the body of the animal beyond the wound area.
Absolutely true. When you shoot an animal, lead particulate ends up traveling pretty far from the wound area as shown in the X-ray. I don't see a pamphlet warning about toxins meaning "antis are trying to ban lead ammo because of its effects on humans" but...ymmv.

There are some really good studies out there with lots of deer being examined and x-rayed and the amount of particles and distance of travel being examined.
Read some studies from Europe talking about blood levels and the amount of lead in meat but its a really hard thing to pull off. I mean you can't control for one kind of ammo it was exactly, where it hit the animal, how many times the animal was shot, how the butchering was done, etc. But its a fact that lots of small pieces end up far from where you shot the animal.
chasseur said:This started over protection of the eagle population which is funny in this situation our eagle population has been increasing for years not declining
Did she say the population's existence was threatened by this? Even if it were still rising, I can see why someone would advocate for less use of lead ammo because eagles are getting poisoned and dying. I honestly don't know if our population is rising or falling, have only worked on one bird file so far...but I don't feel like needlessly poisoning any either. Seen enough of em eating gut piles and there are a few dead ones in the office freezer I hope we can get tested someday.