Yes I have looked at that beast, unfortunately it's not been tried and tested yet, and frankly it's a whole lot of money, essentially crowd-sourcing their build on that rifle for something that could easily just wind up shooting like an sg542 (4moa) could it ever be as great as a SR25, very likely, but also very risky it could wind up pretty lemonized. I'm going to wait for a 308 purchase, I still have a whole lot of research to do on that calibre, platform, ergos, action, and scopes.
I'm extremely risk averse these days since my Christensen Arms disaster.
Good call. I'm a huge fan of semi auto 308 especially the AR308 rifles. That's a lot of money for a boutique rifle. Frankly I find it hard to believe that will stand as a non restricted rifle and not an AR variant. Especially considering how the term "variant" has been applied in the past to stuff that wasn't. With the AR308 there is no universal design ( I know you know this, but let me go on anyways). IE many brands uppers/lowers don't work with others. Many have piston systems that aren't the same operating system as the AR (ie direct impingement DI) and yet they are restricted. Heck even 22LR rifles that use blow back designs along with an upper/lower that won't work with a regular AR15 has in the past received BS "variant" status.
From what I see, it's a modified DPMS AR308 bolt (confirmed on another thread), Uses upper/lower with AR style although changed up and only one take down pin on the front with a different back connecting system that utilizes a spring loaded deal, uses AR308 furniture, mags, barrels. The only thing different is the modified bolt, AG42 based DI gas system, and the shape of the upper/lower with the back pin along with the trigger. There are as many or more differences with the HK MR308 to the AR10 along with other AR308 rifles also being significantly different.
Also It was supposed to be 2 weeks for the final review and it's been 3 with a possible 8 being stated on the main thread. I hope it stays non restricted, but honestly I'm not holding my breath. There is also the new legislation which has been held up a bit due to recent events. But.... there could be some very interesting options coming from that.. Worth waiting and seeing.
As for the 223 debate. The Swiss was an option but not now. Also while I have had 1 moa with mine, many aren't as accurate, plus the barrel heats up fairly quick since it's not a heavy profile. The SL8 and ACR are really the only two options I would consider with your list of requirements. The XCR, is a non contender to me. Not based on any political stuff, just based on the barrel retention system.


















































