relliott said:So you're telling me then, that I can't get bumped down to "C" class?
Well that's a bummer.
That will be the day
relliott said:So you're telling me then, that I can't get bumped down to "C" class?
Well that's a bummer.
black said:And to solve the problem of one great match bumping you up, increase the minimum number of matches from 3 to 6. That way one or two great matches won't move you up (unless your really close to the bubble)
MrFritz said:Another option is to take your most recent 5 matches, toss out the highest and lowest scores, and then average the remaining three. This removes anomalously high or low scores. If all of your scores are about the same, then removing two of them will make no difference. If you have an uncharacteristically great match or an exceptionally bad day, they won't make a difference either.
Quigley said:Pretty much Standard deviation....but as much as I like the idea...it would be at least a full time job to calcuate...
The system needs to be accurate...but managable.
We have to rely on volunteers to do the work
Quigley said:Pretty much Standard deviation....but as much as I like the idea...it would be at least a full time job to calcuate...
The system needs to be accurate...but managable.
omen said:I smell another IPSC related IT/online project coming upwe have the user's info... we can easily setup a mechanism for MDs to upload winmss output into the system.. the logic would be simple, someone would just need to mark which matches were classifiers for which divisions...
Quigley said:The logic would be simple...the data would be messy...
35 different versions of WinMss means multiple input of the same person
R Smith, Rob Smith and Robert Smith, Robert J Smith may all be the same person...but an automated system would treat them as seperate.
2Filthy said:Yet another reason to support ICS... as there is only one IPSC Alias to worry about.
Cheers Eh?
Quigley said:Not exactly...
You also have to match to exact spelling on name and date of birth...or it throws out an exception report.
Submitting ICS results is a pain...I expect there aloot of results that never get properly included becase of bad data in the individual WinMss Data sources (one per user)
Trust me...I know a little something about application design and automation...it doesn't always speed things up
Oh yes, one more thing. Judging by what you say about production division, which may or may not be true, then why do you have personalised license plates on your car that say "IPSC GM"?40cal said:Production: NO GM's, not even close. Seeing as Omen and myself have won most of the matches in Ontario, then I think that I can honestly say that. I know what a true GM in Production shoots like. Not like us.
Well, there is your perspective. How do you like reality come back at you?![]()
Madness said:In the end it all comes down to shutting up and shooting, some can, some can't, and some who can't like to say they can, but the score sheet never lies.

SVISTI1911 said:True, but what I don't like is when the score sheet says I can shoot and I myself and everyone else knows I can't.![]()
AlexS said:Oh yes, one more thing. Judging by what you say about production division, which may or may not be true, then why do you have personalised license plates on your car that say "IPSC GM"?
If you want to accuse others of having swelled heads, maybe you need to start with yourself and your car.![]()
omen said:this from a guy who predicted that the whole ipsc-matches.net project would crash and burn![]()
![]()
(sorry, couldn't resist!)



























