

On another note I have also brought my Jard into Wanstalls for testing. So they can see how the rifle preforms with the updated parts. If all goes well we may start seeing these come back into the country.
Fewer right angles on the receiver would go a long way to diminishing the "Siege of Leningrad" vibe it gives off.The thing is so frign ugly. Almost worse than (old school) Bushmaster Assault Rifle. I'd get one simply to cover it with plastic.
Just bought a BNIB one on the EE! Pretty excited to get it.
At the range today and using new ammo. Apparently this gun just didn't like norinco ammo. It is now running flawlessly on remington umc.
Is it consistently unreliable with Nork ammo? Have you sourced a place that will custom make new recoil springs? I'd be interested. Would that help it eat nork ammo reliably at all?
norinco = hot 556
remington umc = weak 223
Military ammo has 'hard' primers. Some will also make the case that you shouldn't use a 5.56 NATO in a .223 chamber. If you research the dimensions they aren't precisely the same. This is where the .223 Wylde comes in. If the bolt isn't closing and the hammer still falls you have a bigger problem.


RL=http://s76.photobucket.com/user/coteb/media/IMG_2146_zps97ukxfky.jpg.html]
Well, got it in the mail and unboxed it. Pretty neat rig! Added a setoff Tavor back up sights and my Bushnell T dot, aswell as a slip on single point sling adaptor. Thanks to Dwight42 for also machining down a picatinney rail that could be added to the forend and throwing it in for free. Dwight42 also had an upgraded trigger added at the factory, aswell as having the muzzle threaded for a flash hider. So far pretty happy with it! Won't be getting to the range anytime soon, but when I do, I'll add details. Sorry for the crappy pics.



























